Auditor Tolerance of Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management in Boardrooms of Politically Connected Nigerian Firms

Abdulmalik, Salau Olarinoye; Ahmad, Ayoib Che

doi:10.17576/ajag-2017-08-09

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Companies in financial distress or poorly performing companies are likely to lead to going-concern problems and financial pressure. Accordingly, there is an expectation that the auditor will carry out more audit procedures (Abdulmalik and Che-Ahmad, 2017;Asthana et al, 2018;Hay et al, 2006). Finally, the study controlled for auditor characteristics by including audit firm size (BIG4) and auditor change (AUDITORCHG).…”

Section: Control Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chief executive officer retirement and auditor’s risk assessment

Abdulmalik

Amran

Ahmad

2020

JFRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to examine the unique nature of family firms by investigating the moderating effect of chief executive officer (CEO) identity on CEO career horizon and the auditor’s client risk assessment. Consistent with literature on family businesses, the level of CEO attachment to socio-emotional wealth (SEW) varies among family businesses. Design/methodology/approach This study used a longitudinal sample of 2,063 non-financial family firm-year observations from 2005 to 2016 listed on the Bursa Malaysia. The study used the general method of moments (GMM), which controls for endogeneity concerns. Findings The results reveal that, without the moderating effect of CEO identity, the relationship between CEO career horizon and auditor’s risk assessment is positive, which suggests that the auditor’s risk perception of retiring CEOs is very high. However, the interaction of CEO identity reverses the relationship as evidenced by the negative and significant coefficient on the interacted terms. The finding suggests that the auditor’s perceived risk associated with CEO career horizon is lower in family firms with CEOs affiliated to family members or in which the CEO has an equity stake. Overall, the findings provide compelling evidence that the extent of the CEO’s attachment to the firm’s SEW affects the auditor’s client risk assessment. Practical implications The findings of the study serve as an enlightenment to policymakers such as Bursa Malaysia and Security Commission that within the family-controlled firms, differences still exist; therefore, there might be a need for future regulatory initiative to cater for the specific need of family-controlled firms. Originality/value The study contributes to prior literature by departing from the agency theory adopted in previous studies on auditor choice in family firms under the assumption that family firms are homogenous.

show abstract

Section: Control Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%