2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditors as intermediaries in the endogenization of an accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 within the telecom industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic issues such as the meaning, function, process, premise, standard, and foundation of accounting identi cation were discussed starting from the de nition of accounting identi cation. At this time, the research on accounting identi cation was standardized [4]. Later, the theory of accounting con rmation and measurement in the accounting theoretical system was expounded from the research perspective of the accounting theoretical system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic issues such as the meaning, function, process, premise, standard, and foundation of accounting identi cation were discussed starting from the de nition of accounting identi cation. At this time, the research on accounting identi cation was standardized [4]. Later, the theory of accounting con rmation and measurement in the accounting theoretical system was expounded from the research perspective of the accounting theoretical system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelger and Speiß (2017) also allude to the accounting profession as part of an inner circle of interested actors to whom the IASB has granted special license to participate and who provide expertise on standards through internal outreach. Likewise, Kohler et al (2021) show how large accounting firms act as intermediaries between the IASB and industry representatives around deliberations on proposed accounting standards.…”
Section: Influencing Accounting Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expertise), often through coalitions that gather stakeholders with aligned interests around specific policy issues, such as professional associations (Fairfield, 2015;Greenwood et al, 2002). It may also encompass the professional work of 'intermediation' or 'translating' regulations into practice as GPSFs shape the content and implementation of, for instance, accounting regulations and standards (Fransen & LeBaron, 2019;Hasseldine et al, 2011;Herman, 2020;Kohler et al, 2021). Cases abound, illustrating the lobbying prowess of a coherent professional services sector in, e.g., shaping trade rules to create a "global market for accounting and audit services" (Arnold, 2005), trading 'cash for favours' by providing financial contributions to transnational accounting standard-setters (Mattli & Büthe, 2005), and undoing or weakening new global tax regulation aimed at client firms (R. C. Christensen, 2020;Kalaitzake, 2019).…”
Section: Transnational Power In Professional Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%