1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31658.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Assessment Strategy and Materials for Adult and Child Candidates for Cochlear Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest in cochlear implants for the deaf has increased steadily over the last decade. In general, the majority of attention has focused on investigating the types of auditory information provided by the implant (Dillier, 1980;Evans, 1978), refining the type of electrode used to electrically stimulate remaining auditory nerve fibers (Hochmair-Desoyer, 1981), revising processing schemes used to "translate" acoustic signals to electrical stimulation patterns (Blarney et al, 1985;Merzenich, 1983), exploring the long-term effects of introducing a foreign material to the inner ear (Ibrahim, 1980;Leake-Jones, 1982) and evaluating the perceptual performance of persons who receive such devices (Bilger et al, 1977;Clark, 1981aClark, , 1981bDent, 1982;Edgerton et al, 1983). Although these are clearly areas of concern, they share a common focus: What is the best way to provide useful sensory information to a deaf individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in cochlear implants for the deaf has increased steadily over the last decade. In general, the majority of attention has focused on investigating the types of auditory information provided by the implant (Dillier, 1980;Evans, 1978), refining the type of electrode used to electrically stimulate remaining auditory nerve fibers (Hochmair-Desoyer, 1981), revising processing schemes used to "translate" acoustic signals to electrical stimulation patterns (Blarney et al, 1985;Merzenich, 1983), exploring the long-term effects of introducing a foreign material to the inner ear (Ibrahim, 1980;Leake-Jones, 1982) and evaluating the perceptual performance of persons who receive such devices (Bilger et al, 1977;Clark, 1981aClark, , 1981bDent, 1982;Edgerton et al, 1983). Although these are clearly areas of concern, they share a common focus: What is the best way to provide useful sensory information to a deaf individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%