2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-018-3594-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory brainstem response to speech in children with high functional autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, another study found longer wave V for school aged ASD children (Kamita et al, 2020 ). A study concluded that latencies of all speech-evoked ABR waves and V-A complex duration are longer in the ASD group compared to healthy controls (Ramezani et al, 2019 ). Other studies found differences in specific waves such as latencies in waves C, D, E, F (El Shennawy et al, 2014 ), and wave O (El Shennawy et al, 2014 ; Jones et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, another study found longer wave V for school aged ASD children (Kamita et al, 2020 ). A study concluded that latencies of all speech-evoked ABR waves and V-A complex duration are longer in the ASD group compared to healthy controls (Ramezani et al, 2019 ). Other studies found differences in specific waves such as latencies in waves C, D, E, F (El Shennawy et al, 2014 ), and wave O (El Shennawy et al, 2014 ; Jones et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ABR has provided the most insight into the function of brainstem centers in ASD. The majority of studies of the ABR in subjects with ASD over the past 40 years provide evidence that subjects with ASD have smaller amplitudes in waves I, II, III, IV, and V (Ornitz et al, 1972 ; Gillberg et al, 1983 ; Martineau et al, 1987 , 1992 ; Klin, 1993 ), longer latencies between waves I-III and waves I-V (Taylor et al, 1982 ), and longer latencies/slower responses (Ornitz, 1969 ; Student and Sohmer, 1978 ; Rosenblum et al, 1980 ; Sohmer, 1982 ; Tanguay et al, 1982 ; Gillberg et al, 1983 ; Sersen et al, 1990 ; Thivierge et al, 1990 ; Wong and Wong, 1991 ; Maziade et al, 2000 ; Kwon et al, 2007 ; Roth et al, 2012 ; Azouz et al, 2014 ; Taş et al, 2017 ; Miron et al, 2018 , 2021 ; Ramezani et al, 2019 ; Delgado et al, 2021 ; reviewed in Talge et al, 2018 ). These longer latency and lower amplitude responses have been attributed to the immaturity of brainstem circuits (Li et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FFR is sensitive to changes in human communication involving hearing, language, and learning. For more than 2 decades, studies have shown that FFR is able to reveal different aspects of communication impairment, such as auditory processing deficits (Filippini et al, 2012;Graydon et al, 2019;Johnson et al, 2005;Koravand et al, 2019;Krishnamurti et al, 2013;Lotfi et al, 2019), phonological disorders (Bonacina et al, 2019;Ferreira et al, 2019), learning difficulties (Banai et al, 2009;Malayeri et al, 2014), dyslexia (Basu et al, 2010;Hornickel & Kraus, 2013), and a Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences Graduate Program, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil even autism (Chen et al, 2019;Font-Alaminos et al, 2020;Ramezani et al, 2018). The FFR proves to be very versatile, and its application goes beyond assessment related to hearing only, as it provides rich information about the neural encoding of speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%