1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01531818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory brainstem responses in childhood psychosis

Abstract: Auditory brainstem responses were compared in 24 autistic children, 7 children with other childhood psychoses, and 31 normal children. One-third of the autistic children showed abnormal ABR indicative of brainstem dysfunction and correlating with muscular hypotonia and severe language impairment. The children with other psychoses and the normal children showed normal results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
5

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
23
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of auditory sensory physiology at the level of the brainstem indicate normal functioning in approximately 67-77% of autistic individuals as measured by I-V wave interval of the auditory brainstem-evoked response (ABR) (e.g., Gillberg, Rosenhall, & Johansson, 1983). If this level (67-77%) of normal brainstem response were predictive or deterministic of N1 amplitude, we would not have found a statistically significant N1 effect with only nine subjects.…”
Section: The N1 Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent studies of auditory sensory physiology at the level of the brainstem indicate normal functioning in approximately 67-77% of autistic individuals as measured by I-V wave interval of the auditory brainstem-evoked response (ABR) (e.g., Gillberg, Rosenhall, & Johansson, 1983). If this level (67-77%) of normal brainstem response were predictive or deterministic of N1 amplitude, we would not have found a statistically significant N1 effect with only nine subjects.…”
Section: The N1 Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While there have been many studies using the ABR to characterize hearing and auditory function in individuals with AD, fi ndings have been mixed to date. Several investigators have reported prolongations in clickevoked ABR wave latencies and/or interpeak intervals (IPI) in children and adults with AD (Tanguay et al, 1982;Gillberg et al, 1983;Wong & Wong, 1991;Maziade et al, 2000;Tas et al, 2007;Kwon et al, 2007), however others report no group differences (Rumsey et al, 1984;Courchesne et al, 1985;Tharpe et al, 2006).…”
Section: Sharon Fujikawa-brooksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the absolute latencies can be influenced by peripheral hearing loss, the interpeak latencies are generally accepted as measures of central neural conduction time and are influenced by myelination of nerve fibers [11].…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Response (Abr) Testmentioning
confidence: 99%