2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory event-related potentials in separating patients with depressive disorders and non-depressed controls: A narrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent narrative review by Kangas et. al stated that LDAEP studies have generally yielded no consistent difference between depressed and non-depressed controls, though there appears to be a relationship with depression-subtypes (18). Given this context, a possible explanation for our results not supporting the original hypothesis could be that the LDAEP does not precisely mirror serotonergic tone in the primary auditory cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent narrative review by Kangas et. al stated that LDAEP studies have generally yielded no consistent difference between depressed and non-depressed controls, though there appears to be a relationship with depression-subtypes (18). Given this context, a possible explanation for our results not supporting the original hypothesis could be that the LDAEP does not precisely mirror serotonergic tone in the primary auditory cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An abundance of literature now exists exploring the relationship between the LDAEP and other neurotransmitter systems and biomarkers (18, 19). While evidence for the LDAEP’s relationship with serotonin is controversial, it is clear serotonergic activity serves a critical role in the functioning of the primary auditory cortex (18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Numerous studies provide robust support for the influence of serotonergic activity on neuronal functioning across auditory processing pathways (25, 26, 27, 28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an enhanced response specifically to sad faces) commonly reported in early sensory ERP responses in previous depression studies (Dai & Feng, 2012; Ruohonen et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2015). Thus, even though pain and depression are commonly co‐morbid, and even though chronic pain patients (Dick et al, 2006; Yao et al, 2011) and neuropsychiatric patients (for reviews, see Kangas et al, 2022; Toshihiko Maekawa et al, 2012) display some similar anomalies in task‐irrelevant auditory processing, visual face processing may not be similarly affected in acute pain and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first characteristic is reduced glutamate synaptic efficacy as reflected in reduced amplitude of sensory evoked potentials ( 36 ) and in reduced cortical functional connectivity ( 23 ). Also, a recent study in PTSD with or without comorbid major depression ( 37 ) reported reduced synaptic strength as reflected by reduced “energy per cycle,” i.e., decreased metabolic activity (tricarboxylic acid cycle activity) per each molecule of glutamate released by neurons.…”
Section: The Neurobiology Of Depression: Beyond the Monoamine Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%