1989
DOI: 10.1093/bja/62.5.522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Evoked Potentials During Propofol Anaesthesia in Man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AEP results observed in this study are in agreement with data from studies in humans, which showed dose‐dependent effects upon the AEP with propofol alone (Chassard et al. , 1989; Tooley et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The AEP results observed in this study are in agreement with data from studies in humans, which showed dose‐dependent effects upon the AEP with propofol alone (Chassard et al. , 1989; Tooley et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The statistical test here compares the P K value with 0.50, which is the P K value that represents no association P K for VRS P K for OAA=S score P K for BIS Block p level 0.747 * 0.748 * 0.594 * Block t level 0.670 * 0.662 * 0.507 BIS 0.662 * 0.728 * - Sedation during epidural anaesthesia circuits in the brainstem interact with reticular nuclei providing the anatomical basis for the defence alertness reaction, sensory information control, and even sleep regulation. 17 18 Taken into account the very limited BAEP response to general anaesthetics, [22][23][24][25] even at anaesthetic depths associated with EEG burst suppression, 30 believe that the significant correlation of sensory block with the latency of brainstem potential III involves a selective effect of sensory deafferentation on the activity of the midbrain region inside and in the vicinity of inferior colliculus. Despite the fact that sensory input (including auditory stimulation) from the unblocked areas of the body might have counteracted any deafferentation effect on BAEP in unmedicated volunteers, brainstem conduction showed a significant positive correlation with the block level and sedation depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because propofol has been reported to suppress markedly the AEP [26], BIS [27], SEF [5] and MF [6] in dose-dependent fashion, changes in propofol blood concentration, especially its protein unbinding fraction, should affect the results. In the present study, the mean target propofol blood concentration was managed within a narrow range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%