1996
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199609000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method used in this test is a relatively new one that has not been previously published to evaluate the squat-stand activity [34]. In the weight relief condition, all of the ICCs of the posturographic parameters exceeded 0.75, which indicated good test-retest reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used in this test is a relatively new one that has not been previously published to evaluate the squat-stand activity [34]. In the weight relief condition, all of the ICCs of the posturographic parameters exceeded 0.75, which indicated good test-retest reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the three subjects included in the in-depth study, Subject 1 had the largest increase in the 30sCST (+5) from pre-to post-intervention. This improvement may be mediated by the more symmetrical STS performance and increased ability of generating force of the affected lower-limb muscles during the STS action ( Fowler & Carr, 1996 ; Dean, Richards, & Malouin, 2000). For the other two subjects, slightly different strategies were seen during the STS movement after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%