2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory filter width affects response magnitude but not frequency specificity in auditory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While our findings provide no support for the neural adaptation model, they also underscore the distinction between the attenuation of the N1 response to the second sound of a pair (or train) and the amplitude decreases associated with the degree of similarity between sounds that have been reported in studies using long sequences of alternating (Näätänen et al, ; Yagcioglu & Ungan, ) or randomly varying (Herrmann et al, ) tones. It would be of interest that future investigations address differences between the suppressive mechanisms at work in these two cases.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While our findings provide no support for the neural adaptation model, they also underscore the distinction between the attenuation of the N1 response to the second sound of a pair (or train) and the amplitude decreases associated with the degree of similarity between sounds that have been reported in studies using long sequences of alternating (Näätänen et al, ; Yagcioglu & Ungan, ) or randomly varying (Herrmann et al, ) tones. It would be of interest that future investigations address differences between the suppressive mechanisms at work in these two cases.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…In studies using pure tones alternating in frequency (Näätänen et al, ; Yagcioglu & Ungan, ) or perceived spatial location (Butler, ; Näätänen et al, ), the N1 has been shown to decrease in amplitude with decreasing differences between the two alternating tones. Herrmann et al recorded N1 responses to pure tones varying randomly in frequency and found that the amplitudes were lower the closer the tone frequency was to the center of the variation range (Herrmann, Henry, Scharinger, & Obleser, ; Herrmann, Schlichting, & Obleser, ). Whereas such results have been interpreted as evidencing stimulus‐specific adaptation, they are not necessarily in conflict with ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrained neural responses to AM and FM are dissociable in humans6061 and non-human animals62. Previous work from our laboratory moreover indicates that, while the time course of cortical adaptation to repeated sounds contracts with age49, the pattern of cortical frequency-specific adaptation does not differ between younger and older adults48. Lastly, comparisons of topographies for entrained responses to FM versus evoked responses to tone-sequence stimulation suggest that the two response types originate from non-redundant cortical generators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…3b). Thus, although N1 amplitudes were actually larger for older compared to younger adults4849, P2 amplitudes were reduced in older adults and correlated with the magnitude of 2.8 Hz entrainment. This held also for separate analyses in younger ( ρ =0.54, P =0.02 (Spearman rank-order correlations, n =20)) and in older adults ( ρ =0.43, P =0.06 (Spearman rank-order correlations, n =20)), ruling out the possibility that the overall correlation reflects age effects on both variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Previous work in animals showed enhanced firing rates along the ascending auditory pathway following hearing loss and accompanying ageing (Popelár et al ., ; Syka et al ., ; Hughes et al ., ; Manzoor et al ., ). In particular, auditory cortex neural activity appears to be enhanced in animals with hearing loss (Stolzberg et al ., ) as well as in aged animals and humans (Laffont et al ., ; Hughes et al ., ; Herrmann et al ., , ; Bidelman et al ., ). Assuming that synaptic neuronal activity at the soma and dendrites (input to a neuron or neuronal population) strongly contributes to the LFP and spiking reflects the output of a neuron or neuronal population (Bullock, ; Logothetis et al ., ; Logothetis & Wandell, ; Buzsáki et al ., ), the current data show that within a single midbrain structure (inferior colliculus) neuronal response magnitudes become relatively enhanced from synaptic to spiking activity in aged animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%