Neuroscience of Preference and Choice 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-381431-9.00020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Preferences and Aesthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ratcliffe et al (2013), some participants felt that the novelty of certain bird sounds would be helpful for restoration, but findings from this study contradict this position and suggest that, when measured quantitatively, familiar bird sounds are perceived as potentially restorative, low in arousal, and generating a sense of being away. Notably, familiarity was not predictive of valence score, which contradicts findings from literature on music perception, where familiarity has been found to be related to intensity of emotional responses such as liking (McDermott, 2012). Participants' imagined need for restoration in this study may have made ratings of familiarity more relevant for arousal score than for valence.…”
Section: Aestheticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Ratcliffe et al (2013), some participants felt that the novelty of certain bird sounds would be helpful for restoration, but findings from this study contradict this position and suggest that, when measured quantitatively, familiar bird sounds are perceived as potentially restorative, low in arousal, and generating a sense of being away. Notably, familiarity was not predictive of valence score, which contradicts findings from literature on music perception, where familiarity has been found to be related to intensity of emotional responses such as liking (McDermott, 2012). Participants' imagined need for restoration in this study may have made ratings of familiarity more relevant for arousal score than for valence.…”
Section: Aestheticscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These were computed using the bioacoustics software Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2012). Self-report measures of aesthetic properties (familiarity, complexity, and pattern) were used due to the more subjective nature of these variables, particularly familiarity (see McDermott, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goel and Etwaroo (2006) observed that exposure to a recording of birdsong combined with classical music significantly reduced self-reported depression and anger in a sample of University students, both depressed and nondepressed. While the findings suggest that listening to birdsong, among other sounds, can have rapid effects on self-reported mood, the study does not dissociate the effects of birdsong from the effects of music, a stimulus which is well-known to induce affective change (see McDermott, 2012, for a review). In a laboratory experiment, Benfield et al (2014) exposed participants to a stress-and negative affect-inducing video and then to one of four conditions: natural sounds (birdsong and rustling leaves); natural sounds plus traffic; natural sounds plus voices; or a control condition with no audio present.…”
Section: Subjectively Measured Restorationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In 2014, the International Organization of Standardization developed a broader definition of soundscape: acoustic environment as perceived or experienced and/or understood by a person or people, in context [18]. Assessment of soundscape is part of sensory aesthetics research and the aesthetic response of surroundings is considered to be a mix of high pleasure, excitement and relaxation [19,20]. In terms of positive effects, a study suggested that nature-and culture-related sounds, such as fountains, birds singing, bells and music from clock, which induce tranquil and pleasant feelings, are preferred in urban squares, as opposed to artificial sounds [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%