2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory repetition enhancement at short interstimulus intervals for frequency-modulated tones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neural processing of repetitive FM sweeps in the human auditory cortex appears to differ from that of repetitive pure tones. Previous MEG studies using a two-tone adaptation paradigm supported our results by demonstrating that auditory evoked fields elicited by subsequent FM sweeps were larger when the preceding and subsequent FM sweeps were identical than when they had opposite FM directions; however, this effect was not observed in repetitive complex tones (Heinemann et al, 2010 , 2011 ). These findings were consistent with our results demonstrating maximal normalized N1m source strengths elicited by four repetitive identical FM sweeps in the “Identical” sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The neural processing of repetitive FM sweeps in the human auditory cortex appears to differ from that of repetitive pure tones. Previous MEG studies using a two-tone adaptation paradigm supported our results by demonstrating that auditory evoked fields elicited by subsequent FM sweeps were larger when the preceding and subsequent FM sweeps were identical than when they had opposite FM directions; however, this effect was not observed in repetitive complex tones (Heinemann et al, 2010 , 2011 ). These findings were consistent with our results demonstrating maximal normalized N1m source strengths elicited by four repetitive identical FM sweeps in the “Identical” sequence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Positron emission tomography (Zatorre and Belin, 2001 ) and functional MRI (Jamison et al, 2006 ) studies demonstrated that the right hemisphere plays a dominant role in spectral processing. Previous MEG studies (Heinemann et al, 2011 ; Okamoto and Kakigi, 2015 ) also revealed that the N1m responses elicited by FM sweeps were larger in the right than in the left hemisphere. The right hemispheric dominance for FM sweep processing observed in the present study is also consistent with previous findings demonstrating that auditory cortex lesions in the right hemisphere caused severe impairments in detecting the frequency modulation of test sounds, whereas lesions in the left did not cause such an impairment in animals (Wetzel et al, 1998 ; Rybalko et al, 2006 ) or humans (Johnsrude et al, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This scenario might be in part due to an increased BOLD response for repeated stimuli, a phenomenon termed repetition enhancement (RE) (Segaert et al, 2013;Müller et al, 2013). Although the factors that determine a suppression or an increase of neuronal response to repeated stimulation have not yet been fully understood, RE has been repeatedly documented across sensory modalities (e.g., Doehrmann et al, 2010;Heinemann et al, 2011), and also using fMRI-adaptation auditory paradigms in the human IC (Chandrasekaran et al, 2012). Additionally, earlier magnetoencephalographic recordings have shown auditory RE effects for repeated sounds delivered at fast presentation rate (Loveless et al, 1989(Loveless et al, , 1996, similarly to the stimulus timing we employed our design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isochrony did not have an effect in our experiment in affecting the population response to the 200 ms stimuli. There is some evidence that at least two different processes can affect neuronal responses to isochronous stimuli: repetition‐following (Wang & Scheich, ) or an increase in baseline activity (Heinemann et al ., ; Keceli et al ., ). How can our finding of no main effect of isochrony be reconciled with evidence that modulation rate (Kilgard & Merzenich, ) and repetition time (Phillips et al ., ; Bendor & Wang, ; Dong et al ., ; Ma et al ., ; Recasens et al ., ) are encoded in the auditory cortex and can affect neuronal activity?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%