1993
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91486-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory sensory gating in the rat hippocampus: modulation by brainstem activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this idea, some PPTg cells in cat were found to respond to conditioned stimuli in a context-dependent way, failing to respond to the same cue when another signal indicated a different task requirement (Dormont et al, 1998). However, these data are difficult to interpret, because there were multiple sequential sensory cues, which may have triggered prepulse inhibition of later responses (Bickford et al, 1993;Moxon et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Consistent with this idea, some PPTg cells in cat were found to respond to conditioned stimuli in a context-dependent way, failing to respond to the same cue when another signal indicated a different task requirement (Dormont et al, 1998). However, these data are difficult to interpret, because there were multiple sequential sensory cues, which may have triggered prepulse inhibition of later responses (Bickford et al, 1993;Moxon et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Filtering of repetitive auditory stimulation has also been observed in the pontine reticular formation (PRF) (Bickford et al, 1993;Moxon et al, 1999), in the medial septum (Moxon et al, 1999), in the reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) (Krause et al, 2003) and in the amygdala (Cromwell et al, 2005). In addition, hippocampal auditory gating is influenced by stimulation of both the PRF and nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (NLL) (Bickford et al, 1993).…”
Section: Compensatory Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering of repetitive auditory stimulation has also been observed in the pontine reticular formation (PRF) (Bickford et al, 1993;Moxon et al, 1999), in the medial septum (Moxon et al, 1999), in the reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) (Krause et al, 2003) and in the amygdala (Cromwell et al, 2005). In addition, hippocampal auditory gating is influenced by stimulation of both the PRF and nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (NLL) (Bickford et al, 1993). All but one of these brain regions, the PRF, appear to express the α7 nicotinic receptor (Arimatsu and Seto, 1982;Azam et al, 2003;Breese et al, 1997;Happe and Morley, 2004;Hellstrom-Lindahl et al, 1998;Henderson et al, 2005;Seguela et al, 1993;Thinschmidt et al, 2005;Whiteaker et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 1998).…”
Section: Compensatory Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hippocampus, both lemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory pathways converge, resulting in a gated response to auditory stimuli in the CA3 region (Adler et al 1998). A modulatory action on hippocampal activity by the brain stem has been demonstrated (Vertes and Kocsis 1997) and is thought to contribute to auditory gating in this brain region (Bickford et al 1993;Vertes and Kocsis 1997). But how do these auditory pathways relate to the nRT and how do they contribute to auditory gating in this thalamic region?…”
Section: Mechanisms Underlying Auditory Gating: Lemniscal Versus Nonlmentioning
confidence: 99%