1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0021963099003947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Temporal Processing in Disabled Readers With and Without Oral Language Delay

Abstract: Inferior auditory temporal processing has been postulated as causally linked to phonological processing deficits in disabled readers with concomitant oral language delay (LDRDs), and absent in specifically disabled readers with normal oral language (SRDs). This investigation compared SRDs, LDRDs and normal readers aged 7-10 years on measures of auditory temporal processing (temporal order judgement) and phonological decoding (nonword reading). LDRDs exhibited deficits in temporal order judgement compared with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
3
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
80
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Breier et al (2002) specifically excluded children with oral language difficulties. Moreover, Heath et al (1999) also found nonspeech auditory processing deficits in only those poor readers with concomitant oral language difficulties and not those poor readers without oral language difficulties. Both Waber et al (2001) and Breier et al (2002) concluded that children with dyslexia have difficulties with speech perception that produce deficits on temporal processing tests, but do not have a pervasive deficit in auditory temporal processing.…”
Section: Low-level Auditory Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Breier et al (2002) specifically excluded children with oral language difficulties. Moreover, Heath et al (1999) also found nonspeech auditory processing deficits in only those poor readers with concomitant oral language difficulties and not those poor readers without oral language difficulties. Both Waber et al (2001) and Breier et al (2002) concluded that children with dyslexia have difficulties with speech perception that produce deficits on temporal processing tests, but do not have a pervasive deficit in auditory temporal processing.…”
Section: Low-level Auditory Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Noteworthy is the observation that reader group differences in these studies tended to be more reliable in contrasts involving more severely impaired readers, suggesting that basic deficits in speech perception and production may underlie phonological skills deficiencies in only some poor readers (Heath, Hogben, & Clark, 1999). This pattern of results suggests that deficiencies in phonological skills such as phonological awareness and letter-sound decoding may, in some children, be caused by factors other than basic deficits in speech perception and/or production, such as inadequate instruction and experience.…”
Section: Language and Language-based Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These classifications are not independent of general cognitive abilities, since dyslexics with language difficulties and also had lower cognitive scores (e.g. verbal IQ of dyslexics with oral language delay was 88.3 [12], lower than that of other subtypes). Consistent with associating lower cognitive abilities with poorer perceptual performance, Banai and Ahissar [13] found that a subgroup of adult dyslexics characterized by poor frequency discrimination (measured with an ISI of B1 s) also scored poorly on a standard cognitive test (Raven's Matrices [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it is difficult to divide dyslexics to those with and without phonetic deficits, since most have both [1]. Another classification is based on co-morbidity of reading difficulties with other learning disorders, such as an oral language delay [12]. Indeed, several studies suggested that temporal processing deficits are found only among dyslexics with concomitant language disorders [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation