1996
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmentation of femoral neck fracture fixation with an injectable calcium‐phosphate bone mineral cement

Abstract: The first goal of this study was to determine if augmentation with an injectable, in situ setting, calcium-phosphate cement that is capable of being remodeled and was designed to mimic bone mineral significantly improved the strength and stiffness of fixation in a cadaveric femoral neck fracture model. The second goal was to determine if greater increases in fixation strength were achieved as the bone density of the specimen decreased. Sixteen pairs of fresh cadaveric human femora with a mean age of 70.9 years… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
48
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Some investigators used injectable calcium phosphate cements. 18,[21][22][23][24][25] These materials, however, have inferior mechanical properties, especially in shear and tension, which occur in the human proximal femur. 19 Another drawback in earlier studies was the cement distribution pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some investigators used injectable calcium phosphate cements. 18,[21][22][23][24][25] These materials, however, have inferior mechanical properties, especially in shear and tension, which occur in the human proximal femur. 19 Another drawback in earlier studies was the cement distribution pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] The application of different bone cements, mostly based on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphates (CaP), is a promising approach for further reducing implant cut-out. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, no standardized technique has so far been developed that achieves safe and reproducible augmentation. Furthermore, infiltration of the trabecular network with viscous bone cements is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several injectable biomaterials have been developed. Some of these injectable bone substitutes are made of CaP hydraulic cements that harden in the bone defect [1,2]. Others are composed of CaP granules suspended in hydrogel as they are the most interesting carriers actually used for the development of injectable bone substitute.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, synthetic bone substitutes have been introduced for use in fracture surgery with special emphasis on the enhancement of osteopenic bone. In a mechanical study by Stankewich et al (1996), augmentation with calcium phosphate cement provided enhanced stiffness, stability and strength of fixed femoral neck fractures. When resorbable substances are used, the idea is that the initial reinforcement will be followed by progressive resorption over timeassociated with a simultaneous increase in structural support provided by the healing bone (Witschger et al 1991, Constantz et al 1995, Kopylov et al 1996, Stankewich et al 1996, Mainil et al 1997, Moore et al 1997, Frankenburg et al 1998, Goodman et al 1998, Knaack et al 1998, Yetkinler et al 1999, Larsson and Bauer 2002.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%