Abstract. Calcium phosphate bioceramic granules associated with hydrosoluble polymers formed putties currently more used in clinical applications as they are easy to handle (injectability, moldability). In this study, 2 kinds of materials were tested in rabbit bone defects. The first one is In'Oss™ (Biomatlante), a microporous biphasic CaP granules (BCP, HA/TCP mixture) with polysaccharidic hydrogel; and the second one is Actifuse ABX™ (Baxter/Apatech), pure hydroxyapatite granules containing silicate (HA-Si) with blocks copolymer hydrogel (poloxamer), . The aim of this study was to compare osteogenic properties of two kinds of CaP putties containing HA-Si versus BCP and the kinetic of resorption of their hydrogel. Data have demonstrated that both hydrogels increase the handling properties. Bone regeneration was observed in the two types of sample, however at 3 weeks, Actifuse ABX hydrogel was not totally absorbed, while In'Oss hydrogel was no longer observed. The second difference observed was osteoconduction. Newly formed bone over the time period studied was moreover in close contact with BCP granules than with HA-Si granules. Larger granules resorption on time was observed for BCP compared to HA-Si. Resorption of Actifuse ABX remains limited and explains the faster kinetic of absorption for In'Oss. This study demonstrates biocompatibility, absorbability and bone ingrowth at the expense of the two types of putty injectable/moldable bioceramic used for bone regeneration.
IntroductionCalcium phosphate bioceramic granules associated with hydrosoluble polymers are currently more used. Different combination were proposed with polymers as gelatine, collagen, fibrin, DBM, hyaluronic acid or synthetic polymer like poloxamer, cellulose derivative etc. To date, several injectable biomaterials have been developed. Some of these injectable bone substitutes are made of CaP hydraulic cements that harden in the bone defect [1,2]. Others are composed of CaP granules suspended in hydrogel as they are the most interesting carriers actually used for the development of injectable bone substitute. The first material tested in this study is an injectable resorbable bone substitute consisting of microporous BCP granules in suspension associated with a hydrosoluble polymer of derivative cellulose [3,4]. The second one is based on a suspension of hydroxyapatite containing silicate granules and a hydrogel poloxamer [5]. The purpose of this study was to compare the biocompatibility and the kinetic of absorption in critical size defect in rabbit long bones.