2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7799013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented invariance control for systems with smoothness constraints

Abstract: In many applications, the controlled dynamical system is subject to constraints, e.g. to enforce a desired performance. There are various methods, which guarantee the enforcement of such constraints. They do, however, not provide satisfactory solutions if the system state has to exhibit certain smoothness properties. This work presents a novel method of designing a control input, which guarantees the adherence to constraints as well as a desired smoothness of the system state. The control scheme is implemented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is imposed for convenience of notation and poses no additional restrictions on the systems, because the relative degree may be increased, if necessary, by augmented invariance control as introduced for general systems by Kimmel et al (2016) and for robotic systems by Jähne and Hirche (2017). Note that for robotic systems with position constraints, for example, the assumption is naturally fulfilled as the relative degree equals two for all agents.…”
Section: Shared Invariance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is imposed for convenience of notation and poses no additional restrictions on the systems, because the relative degree may be increased, if necessary, by augmented invariance control as introduced for general systems by Kimmel et al (2016) and for robotic systems by Jähne and Hirche (2017). Note that for robotic systems with position constraints, for example, the assumption is naturally fulfilled as the relative degree equals two for all agents.…”
Section: Shared Invariance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%