2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20133706
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented Movelet Method for Activity Classification Using Smartphone Gyroscope and Accelerometer Data

Abstract: Physical activity, such as walking and ascending stairs, is commonly used in biomedical settings as an outcome or covariate. Researchers have traditionally relied on surveys to quantify activity levels of subjects in both research and clinical settings, but surveys are subjective in nature and have known limitations, such as recall bias. Smartphones provide an opportunity for unobtrusive objective measurement of physical activity in naturalistic settings, but their data tends to be noisy and needs to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These classifiers, when applied to free-living conditions, will naturally miss the activities they were not trained on but will also likely overestimate those activities they were trained on. An improved scheme could assume that the observed activities are a sample from a broader spectrum of possible behaviors, including periods when the smartphone is not on a person, or assess the uncertainty associated with the classification of each type of activity 84 . This could also provide for an adaptive approach that would enable observation/interventions suited to a broad range of activities relevant for health, including decreasing sedentary behavior, increasing active transport (i.e., walking, bicycling, or public transit), and improving circadian patterns/sleep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These classifiers, when applied to free-living conditions, will naturally miss the activities they were not trained on but will also likely overestimate those activities they were trained on. An improved scheme could assume that the observed activities are a sample from a broader spectrum of possible behaviors, including periods when the smartphone is not on a person, or assess the uncertainty associated with the classification of each type of activity 84 . This could also provide for an adaptive approach that would enable observation/interventions suited to a broad range of activities relevant for health, including decreasing sedentary behavior, increasing active transport (i.e., walking, bicycling, or public transit), and improving circadian patterns/sleep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity templates function essentially as blueprints for different types of physical activity. In the HAR systems, we reviewed, these templates were compared to patterns of observed raw measurements using various distance metrics 38,84 , such as the Euclidean or Manhattan distance. Given the heterogeneous nature of human activities, activity templates were often enhanced using techniques similar to dynamic time warping 29,57 , which measures the similarity of two temporal sequences that may vary in speed.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first component of HAR is data collection, which requires careful thought about various questions, such as choosing the appropriate sensors, sampling frequency, study environment, and smartphone placement. Some studies use a single sensor [ 11 , 12 ], while other studies simultaneously utilize multiple sensors [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. In our study, we used data collected from two sensors in the smartphone—the accelerometer and gyroscope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be a challenging problem due to: a large number of observations produced each second, the temporal nature of the observations, and the lack of a clear way to relate accelerometer data to known movements [8]. Some of the Machine Learning models that have been already used for the recognition of activities are Movelet Method [9], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [10], Decision Trees [11], Naive Bayes [12] and Markov chains [13]. It should be noticed that although Machine Learning models could be fit to training data, they could not be generalized with sufficient accuracy on data from subjects not included in the training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%