The Aircraft Noise Simulation Working Group (ANSWr), comprised of NASA, DLR, and ONERA, recently completed an analysis campaign to compare aircraft noise simulation tools, establish guidelines for noise prediction, and launch activities to assess uncertainties associated with the simulation. The campaign included the analyses of two DLR conceptual aircraft, a reference tube-and-wing aircraft, and a low noise aircraft with engines mounted above the fuselage-wing-junction. While the total predicted noise for each of the concepts compared favorably among analyses at the peak level, significant differences were noted at the component level. This paper aims to further that effort by auralizing aircraft flyover noise associated with those predictions. Comparisons are made among the NASA, DLR/Empa, and ONERA generated sounds to determine how differences between the system noise prediction and auralization methods result in changes to the auralized sound.