2019
DOI: 10.1101/850917
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but suppresses interphase activity

Abstract: Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitinmediated degradation, and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis before AURKA is degraded during mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on APC/C coactivator FZR1. We used FZR1 knockout cells (FZR1 KO ) and a novel FRET-based AURKA biosensor to investigate how activity is regulated in absence of destruction. We found that AURKA activity in FZR1 KO cells dropped at mitotic exit as rapidly as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(88 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 59 ] However, dAurA383 treatment induces stemness related processes such as “CONRAD stem cell,” which is consistent with our finding that dAurA383 induces a population of CD34 high stem cells. dAurA450 treatment suppresses the stemness related processes such as “hallmark MYC/E2F targets,” “EPPERT Progenitor,” “WONG Embryonic stem cell core,” and “Oxidative phosphorylation,” supporting previous studies that interphase AURKA facilitates stem‐cell‐like phenotypes [ 22–24 ] and increases energy production, [ 45,46 ] and in line with that dAurA450 induces CD34 low cells and suppresses the expression of stem cell markers including c‐Myc, NANOG, STAT5A, and FOXM1. The stemness inhibition may also explain the result that dAurA450 delays the cell division but not obviously changes the cell cycle phase distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 59 ] However, dAurA383 treatment induces stemness related processes such as “CONRAD stem cell,” which is consistent with our finding that dAurA383 induces a population of CD34 high stem cells. dAurA450 treatment suppresses the stemness related processes such as “hallmark MYC/E2F targets,” “EPPERT Progenitor,” “WONG Embryonic stem cell core,” and “Oxidative phosphorylation,” supporting previous studies that interphase AURKA facilitates stem‐cell‐like phenotypes [ 22–24 ] and increases energy production, [ 45,46 ] and in line with that dAurA450 induces CD34 low cells and suppresses the expression of stem cell markers including c‐Myc, NANOG, STAT5A, and FOXM1. The stemness inhibition may also explain the result that dAurA450 delays the cell division but not obviously changes the cell cycle phase distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The process of “oxidative phosphorylation” is enriched in dAurA450 treated cells (Figure 3D), supporting the emerging functions of interphase AURKA in mitochondrial dynamics and energy production. [ 45,46 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%