2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2009.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auroral radio absorption: The prediction question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis shows the exponential frequency dependence of the absorption with -1.5 power coefficient (Fig.4B). This value corresponds well with the data of other observations and models [16,17,18,19,4] and allows to use the proposed model for detecting and estimating the absorption level over the large noise dataset obtained at EKB ISTP SB RAS radar in 2013-2018.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis shows the exponential frequency dependence of the absorption with -1.5 power coefficient (Fig.4B). This value corresponds well with the data of other observations and models [16,17,18,19,4] and allows to use the proposed model for detecting and estimating the absorption level over the large noise dataset obtained at EKB ISTP SB RAS radar in 2013-2018.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The radar field of view is about 1 million square kilometers and is shown in Fig.1A. In regular mode, the radar operates in 16 discrete directions (beams) with 1-2 minute temporal resolution, with 45 km spatial resolution, and at the operating frequencies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] MHz. The radar transmits sequences of short sounding pulses and processes the received signals, scattered from surface and ionospheric irregularities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn makes it a useful tool for study of the dynamics of the D and E regions. Traditionally, there are several techniques in use (Davies, 1969;Hunsucker & Hargreaves, 2002), including constant power 2-to 6-MHz transmitters (URSI A1 and A3 methods; see, e.g., Sauer & Wilkinson, 2008;Schumer, 2010), riometry using cosmic radio space sources at 30-50 MHz (URSI A2 method; Hargreaves, 2010), and imaging riometry (Detrick & Rosenberg, 1990). Recently, a large, spatially distributed network of riometers has been deployed to monitor absorption (Rogers & Honary, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] suggest a lower limit of 0.2 dB for reliability, consistent with the 0.2 dB threshold employed in this study. It can be noted that the literature suggests that deviations from the QDC causing an absorption value of > 1 dB are of note [i.e., Foppiano and Bradley , ; Hargreaves , ].…”
Section: Riometer Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riometers are passive radio antennas that measures background cosmic radio noise emanating from extraterrestrial sources (i.e., stars and galaxies) to gauge the opacity of the ionosphere to radio noise [Little and Leinbach, 1959;Davies, 1990;Browne et al, 1995]. Riometers operate in the VHF band in the 20-60 MHz range [Kavanagh et al, 2004;Hargreaves, 2010], typically at~30 MHz, and measure voltage which changes in response to received energy. Radio noise from fixed cosmic sources is regular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%