Ausdauertraining

Hanakam, Florian; Ferrauti, Alexander

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58227-5_7

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Work ability was measured using the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire only at the time of admission, which includes the following subscales: present working capacity; ability to work concerning the job requirements; diagnosed pathologies; reduction in working capacity due to illness; sick leave over the past 12 months; personal expectations of one's work skills two years onwards; psychological conditions/resources [24]. The WAI score may be rated low , moderate (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), good (37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43), or excellent (44-49). All questionnaires applied had been validated in German populations [25][26][27][28].…”

Section: Exercise Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Mooren,

Garbsch,

Schäfer

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is a multisystemic disorder marked by impaired physical performance as one lead symptom. Since it has been suggested that endurance training as part of medical rehabilitation may be effective in improving physical performance capacity in PCS, this study aimed to compare different modes of aerobic endurance training. Methods: A total of 110 PCS patients (49.3 ± 11.8 years; 38% women; time after infection = 260.2 ± 127.5 days) underwent detailed clinical screening including symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing at admission and after 4–6 weeks of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Questionnaires were used to assess disease perception. Patients performed controlled isocaloric cycle ergometer training (3–5 sessions/week; 18 min) as either continuous training (CT) at 50% of maximal workload or as interval training (IT; load = 60%, relief = 30%). Outcomes of PCS patients were compared to coronary artery disease patients (CAD; n = 96) to evaluate overall training effectiveness. Results: Training participation was comparable between the groups, with no indication of training-specific exercise-induced fatigue. Overall, PCS patients improved significantly by a mean of 6.8 ± 12.1% for W at VT1; 3.1 ± 10.0% for VO2 at VT1; 5.5 ± 14.7% for O2 pulse at VT1; 7.5 ± 15.0% for W at VO2peak; 2.7 ± 11.0% for VO2peak and 4.6 ± 12.4% for O2 pulse at VO2peak (all p < 0.05) with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both groups showed reduced levels of fatigue, anxiety, and depression as well as improved quality of life and wellbeing (all p < 0.05). Compared to guideline-based cardiac rehabilitation, PCS patients showed a similar improvement in workload and oxygen uptake compared to CAD patients. Conclusion: PCS patients benefit from aerobic endurance training performed as moderate continuous or interval training as part of a medical rehabilitation program in terms of improved physical exercise capacity and disease perception. The results for PCS patients are comparable to the guideline-based rehabilitation of CAD patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Exercise Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Mooren,

Garbsch,

Schäfer

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, at discharge, PCS and CAD patients were at ~75% of peak exercise capacity, presenting a need for an efficient maintenance program to further improve physical exercise capacity in both patient groups. Endurance training is known to cause numerous adaptations at different functional levels, relating to the cardiopulmonary system, energy and lipid metabolism, as well as mitochondrial, circulatory and hematologic adaptations (32). Comparable training effects in CAD and PCS patients suggest that PCS patients are able to adapt to aerobic endurance training despite the multisystemic nature of the disease and potentially persistent multi-organ dysfunction with prolonged cardiovascular derangements also during recovery (6).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Work ability was measured using the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire only at the time of admission, which includes the following subscales: present working capacity, ability to work concerning the job requirements; diagnosed pathologies; reduction in working capacity due to illness; sick leave over the past 12 months; personal expectations of one's work skills two years onwards; psychological conditions/resources (23). The WAI score may be rated: low , moderate (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), good (37-43), or excellent (44-49).…”

Section: Exercise Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-Covid-19 Syn-drome – a Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Mooren,

Garbsch,

Schäfer

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is a multisystemic disorder marked by impaired physical performance as one lead symptom. Since it has been suggested that endurance training as part of medical rehabilitation may be effective to improve physical performance capacity in PCS, this study aimed to compare different modes of aerobic endurance training. Methods: Hundred-ten PCS patients (49.3±11.8 years, 38% women, time after infection=260.2±127.5 days) underwent detailed clinical screening including symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing at admission and after 4-6 weeks of inpatient medical rehabilitation. Questionnaires were used to assess disease perception. Patients performed controlled isocaloric cycle ergometer training (3-5 sessions/week, 18 min) as either continuous training (CT) at 50% of maximal workload or as interval training (IT, load=60%, relief=30%). Outcomes of PCS patients were compared to coronary artery disease patients (CAD, n=96) to evaluate overall training effectiveness. Results: Training participation was comparable between both groups with no indication of training-specific exercise-induced fatigue. Overall, PCS patients improved significantly by a mean of 6.8±12.1% for W at VT1, 3.1±10.0% for VO2 at VT1, 5.5±14.7% for O2-pulse at VT1, 7.5±15.0% for W at VO2peak, 2.7±11.0% for VO2peak and 4.6±12.4% for O2-pulse at VO2peak (all p<0.05) with no significant differences between groups (p>0.05). Both groups showed reduced levels of fatigue, anxiety and depression as well as improved quality of life and wellbeing (all p<0.05). Compared to guideline-based cardiac rehabilitation, PCS patients showed a similar improvement in workload and oxygen uptake compared to CAD patients. Conclusion: PCS patients benefit from aerobic endurance training, performed as moderate continuous or interval training as part of a medical rehabilitation program in terms of improved physical exercise capacity and disease perception. Results for PCS patients are comparable to guideline-based rehabilitation of CAD patients. Clinical Trial: NCT06016192

show abstract

“…However, while individualized endurance training is recommended as a part of an optimally designed exercise program in cancer patients [ 21 ], there is still a lack of consensus as to which type of endurance exercise is most effective. Endurance exercise can be performed continuously with low to moderate intensity (MICT) or intermittently [ 22 ]. High-intensity-interval training (HIIT) in particular, consisting of short, high-intensity training sessions (e.g., >80% maximal oxygen consumption [V̇O 2MAX ]) interspersed with low-intensity recovery phases [ 23 , 24 ] has gained interest not only in elite sports but also in the therapy of various diseases [ 25 – 27 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of high-intensity interval training on functional performance and maximal oxygen uptake in comparison with moderate intensity continuous training in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuendorf,

Haase,

Schroeder

et al. 2023

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an appropriate training modality to improve endurance and therefore contributes to physical performance. This review investigates the effect of HIIT on functional performance in cancer patients. We reviewed the relative peak oxygen uptake (relV̇O2PEAK) and meta-analytical compared HIIT with moderate intensity continuous training (MICT). Furthermore, we took various training parameters under consideration. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. For the review, we included randomized controlled trials containing HIIT with cancer patients. From this, we filtered interventions with additional MICT for the meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest were various functional performance assessments and V̇O2MAX. Results The research yielded 584 records which fit the inclusion criteria, of which 31 studies with n=1555 patients (57.4±8.6 years) could be included in the overall review and 8 studies in the meta-analysis (n=268, 59.11±5.11 years) regarding relV̇O2PEAK. Different functional outcomes were found, of which walking distance (+8.63±6.91% meters in 6-min walk test) and mobility (+2.7cm in sit and reach test) improved significantly due to HIIT. In terms of relV̇O2PEAK, the performance of cancer patients was improved by HIIT (10.68±6.48%) and MICT (7.4±4.29%). HIIT can be favored to increase relV̇O2PEAK (SMD 0.37; 95% CI 0.09–0.65; I2=0%; p=0.009). Effect sizes for relV̇O2PEAK improvements correlate moderately with total training volume (Spearman’s ρ=0.49; p=0.03), whereas percentage increases do not (Spearman’s ρ=0.24; p=0.14). Conclusion Functional and physical outcomes were positively altered by different HIIT protocols and forms of implementation, whereas a tendency toward more effectiveness of HIIT vs. MICT was found for relV̇O2PEAK. Future studies should include functional parameters more often, to finally allow a comparison between both training protocols in this regard.

show abstract

Ausdauertraining

Cited by 7 publications

References 48 publications

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome—A Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Medical Rehabilitation of Patients with Post-Covid-19 Syn-drome – a Comparison of Aerobic Interval and Continuous Training

Effects of high-intensity interval training on functional performance and maximal oxygen uptake in comparison with moderate intensity continuous training in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About