2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Austenite stability and M2C carbide decomposition in experimental secondary hardening ultra-high strength steels during high temperature austenitizing treatments

Abstract: The present study deals with the austenite stability and M 2 C carbide decomposition in three secondary hardening ultra-high strength (SHUHS) steels with varying levels of Cr and Mo (2Cr-1Mo, 2Cr-3Mo and 5Cr-5Mo) investigated using Vicker's hardness, optical and electron microscopy. These steels were subjected to high temperature austenitizing treatments at 1000, 1050, 1100 and 1150 o C. It has been established that increasing both Cr and Mo to 5wt. % as well as increasing the austenitizing temperature in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, some alloying elements with a larger radius than Fe (such as W and Mo) cause lattice deformation and increase the lattice constant of α-Fe. On the other hand, these alloying elements can strengthen and improve the stability of austenite, which leads to a decrease in the MS temperature [ 29 ]. Therefore, with the increase in the quenching temperature, the α-Fe peak gradually shifted to the left, and the peak intensity gradually decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, some alloying elements with a larger radius than Fe (such as W and Mo) cause lattice deformation and increase the lattice constant of α-Fe. On the other hand, these alloying elements can strengthen and improve the stability of austenite, which leads to a decrease in the MS temperature [ 29 ]. Therefore, with the increase in the quenching temperature, the α-Fe peak gradually shifted to the left, and the peak intensity gradually decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in hardness of AISI 304L after application of DCT cannot be linked to a more effective transformation of retained austenite into martensite [ 11 , 15 , 36 ] or by higher solution annealing temperature [ 37 ], because the control with a higher selected temperature (1080 °C) has lower hardness value compared to tested DCT1. The other possible and more likely explanation suggested by Myeong et al 1997 [ 25 ] and Baldissera 2010 [ 9 ] is the dislocation pinning effect, which is associated with the increased plastic deformation (residual stress) and thus improvement in hardness after the application of DCT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel : Two different secondary hardening ultra-high-strength steels with varying levels of Cr and Mo (table 1) have been chosen for studying the martensitic transformation during in situ cooling in the temperature range from RT (25°C) to −194°C. Further details on the physical metallurgy of the steels are available elsewhere [21]. During the in situ experiment, the as-quenched sample was cooled down from RT to −194°C and cooling was interrupted at regular temperature intervals to record transformations at that particular temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement of an additional driving force in terms of elastic strain energy is attributed to the presence of a higher amount of austenite stabilizing elements (Cr, Mo, etc.) [21]. It is also interesting to note the discrepancy in predicting the M s and M f temperatures from austenite composition [31] or the empirical relation involving fraction of retained austenite [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%