2004
DOI: 10.1515/9783110904871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australia's Many Voices, Teil 1, Australian English - The National Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinctive features of AusE suggest that it has consolidated its own norms as an independent national standard. AusE is today recognized as a major variety of English, one for which there may be an increasing role as an epicentre in the Asia-Pacifi c region (Leitner 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distinctive features of AusE suggest that it has consolidated its own norms as an independent national standard. AusE is today recognized as a major variety of English, one for which there may be an increasing role as an epicentre in the Asia-Pacifi c region (Leitner 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the study of the historical development of AusE fi rst began to gather momentum in the 1960s, it has more recently enjoyed an upsurge of interest with the posthumous editing of A.G. Mitchell's unfi nished ms by Yallop (see Yallop 2001) and such publications as Leitner (2004) and Fritz (2007). While the focus has traditionally been primarily lexical (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in her reference to Gerhard Leitner (2004), who proposes the term 'epicentre' for a regional standard, Peters is concerned to pursue the implications of such words. Epicentre implies the possibility of the variety (endonormative and stabilized) influencing other varieties, and this is what Peters calls 'epicentric influence', referring specifically to semantically transferred usages found in NZE based on convict settlement, and accordingly necessarily deriving from AusE.…”
Section: Authority and Epicentre: Postcolonial Declarationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian language habitat is thus not a monolingual one, but rather is a multilingual tapestry interwoven with a constantly evolving mixture of indigenous languages, contact languages and migrant languages that overlays the prevailing mAusE paradigm. The way in which mAusE evolved, and its relationship to other forms of Australian English (AusE), such as ethnic Englishes, was addressed in the first volume, Australian English*/A National Language (Leitner 2004). The second volume, Ethnic Englishes, Indigenous and Migrant Languages.…”
Section: Reviewed By Michael Haugh Griffith Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first chapter is a very brief outline of the main focus of the first volume (Leitner 2004), and an overview of the remaining four chapters in the book. The second chapter goes on to discuss indigenous languages, the third chapter addresses migrant languages, and the fourth chapter considers the development of language policy in the Australian context.…”
Section: Reviewed By Michael Haugh Griffith Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%