2006
DOI: 10.1080/00207230601047131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australia, uranium and nuclear power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also argued that, not only has uranium the potential to cause environmental damage in both Australia and recipients' countries, but also its mining and export contribute little to the national economy (Falk et al, 2006). In 2004, uranium mining and export contributed less than 2% to total export value.…”
Section: Impact Of the Sauamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also argued that, not only has uranium the potential to cause environmental damage in both Australia and recipients' countries, but also its mining and export contribute little to the national economy (Falk et al, 2006). In 2004, uranium mining and export contributed less than 2% to total export value.…”
Section: Impact Of the Sauamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming 2007 reasonably assured and inferred resources of 5.5 MtU at < US$130/t [96], nuclear power could avoid at least 180 Gt CO 2 until 2100. The future of nuclear power appears to be strongly influenced by public perception and concerns about safety, waste disposal, and proliferation risk [13,14,65,[97][98][99].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of public perception is further complicated by the fact that media and political campaigns often comment more rapidly and decisively on contentious issues, thus reaching the public more effectively than sources of less biased factual information. For example nuclear energy is often portrayed and hence perceived as an invisible danger under the control of a few, and associated with military use, suppression of information, and high accident risk [13,14]. On the other hand of the spectrum, large hydroelectric dams are associated with the forceful resettlement of large numbers of people, and the destruction of archaeological heritage and biodiversity [15].…”
Section: Number Of Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations