2013
DOI: 10.1108/lm-01-2013-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian academic librarians' perceptions of marketing services and resources

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how Australian academic librarians marketed their services and resources, which marketing approaches were most effective, and the factors influencing the perceptions of the approaches used. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was sent to 37 academic librarians in Australia. The response rate was 54.1 percent. The information sheet and consent form for phone interview participants were e-mailed to 17 participants and ten signed consent forms were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the findings showed a low usage of social media in the academic libraries, the respondents indicated the importance of such tools and their preference for using Twitter, followed by Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. This finding corresponded with Yi et al (2013), Ramsey and Vecchione (2014), Stvilia and Gibradze (2014), Xie and Stevenson (2014) and Al-Daihani and AlAwadhi (2015) that Twitter was one of the most popular social media platforms for library marketing and engagement as it was seen as valuable in connecting the library with users and the community to share information, promote services and events, and reach users and non-users (Forrestal, 2010), thereby achieving the study's first objective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the findings showed a low usage of social media in the academic libraries, the respondents indicated the importance of such tools and their preference for using Twitter, followed by Instagram, Facebook and YouTube. This finding corresponded with Yi et al (2013), Ramsey and Vecchione (2014), Stvilia and Gibradze (2014), Xie and Stevenson (2014) and Al-Daihani and AlAwadhi (2015) that Twitter was one of the most popular social media platforms for library marketing and engagement as it was seen as valuable in connecting the library with users and the community to share information, promote services and events, and reach users and non-users (Forrestal, 2010), thereby achieving the study's first objective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Xie and Stevenson (2014) investigated the use of social media in the digital libraries of ten cultural institutions and found that Facebook and Twitter were the most popular social media applications, and that social media was important within the institutions for providing information, marketing and promotions, connecting with users and sharing information. Yi et al (2013) examined the marketing activities in Australian academic libraries and found that classroom instruction and advertisements were the most effective marketing techniques, followed by one-to-one conversations and training sessions, the library website and social media. It was also found that webcasts, website announcements, workshops and social media tools were most effective in promoting the library's services and resources, while Facebook advertisements, blogs, e-mail, newsletters and Twitter were the most effective Web 2.0 tools for marketing library resources and services.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brochures/leaflets/pamphlets and websites were more frequently used as marketing techniques in Greek academic libraries. Further Yi, et al (2013), Verostek (2005, Hinchliffe andLeon (2011), Benson et al (2016) and Kaur and Rani (2008) had come across similar findings, in the studies they have carried out in Academic Libraries in United States, Australia, Nigeria, India, and Malaysia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…According to Yi et al (2013) "today, there is an increasing need for libraries to implement effective marketing techniques in response to external and internal pressures" (Enache, 2008, p. 478 as cited by Yi et al, 2013, p. 587). They further reported:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, libraries' routine evaluation already performs strength, weakness, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis (Richardson and Kennedy, 2014). Yi et al (2013) used online surveys and phone interviews in the research of Australian academic libraries' perceptions of library marketing. The results showed that several marketing approaches were considered to be effective, including surveys, interviews and breaking down demographic components of user communities.…”
Section: Library Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%