Australian dietitians’ beliefs and attitudes towards weight loss counselling and health at every size counselling for larger‐bodied clients

Abstract

Aim Research suggests that dietitians now employ weight‐neutral (WN) approaches (Health at Every Size (HAES), Intuitive Eating and non‐diet) as well as more traditional weight‐centric (WC) approaches (weight loss counselling) to address adult weight concerns. This study aimed to compare the knowledge of and attitudes towards WN practice compared with WC practice in Australian dietitians who work with larger‐bodied clients as delineated by practice approach. Methods A cross‐sectional web‐based knowledge, attitudes and practices survey was conducted with Australian dietitians who counsel adults with a body mass index >25 kg/m2. Based on their responses, dietitians were categorised into WC (preferring weight loss counselling), WN (preferring HAES counselling) or mixed approach (MA). Between‐group comparisons were conducted using Pearson's chi‐squared tests for knowledge and practice and independent t‐tests for attitudes. Results Of the 317 respondents, 18.3% fulfilled the criteria for WN practitioners, 30.3% for WC practitioners and the remainder were classified as providing a MA. Weight‐neutral approaches were more positively regarded generally than WC approaches (84.5% vs 53.9%) as well as considered professionally responsible (86% vs 58.7%) and perceived as more helpful for clients (61.2% vs 35%). Knowledge of WN practice goals was poor with only 36.9% (n = 117) of the participants indicating correctly that this mode of treatment is incompatible with a weight loss goal. Conclusions Weight‐neutral practice was considered acceptable by Australian dietetics professionals who counsel larger‐bodied people regardless of their personal practice preference although many displayed inaccurate knowledge of WN approaches.

Diet, Digestion, and the Dietitian: A Survey of Clinicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices to Advance the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disturbances in Individuals with Anorexia Nervosa

“…We developed the 32-item Dietitians Anorexia Nervosa Gastrointestinal Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey (ANGI-KAPS). This was guided by published knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) literature [ 30 , 31 ] as well as previous studies of dietitian KAPs [ 32 , 33 ], and other health professionals KAPs of GID [ 34 ] or EDs [ 35 ]. The ANGI-KAPS tool was designed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of ED dietitians treating individuals with AN and GID.…”

Polish Adaptation and Validation of the Intuitive (IES-2) and Mindful (MES) Eating Scales—The Relationship of the Concepts with Healthy and Unhealthy Food Intake (a Cross-Sectional Study)

“…Intuitive and mindful eating are the two most commonly listed non-diet practices focused on the elimination of eating in response to external cues [ 1 ]. With the growing popularity of alternative weight management methods and also among health practitioners [ 2 , 3 ], it is of interest which approach would be most beneficial for maintaining health [ 1 , 4 , 5 ].…”

Compreensão de nutricionistas sobre abordagens não prescritivas no cuidado nutricional

“…Entretanto, num contexto em que cada vez mais nutricionistas aderem a essas abordagensespecialmente no Brasil -, os estudos que investigam esse fenômeno sob a perspectiva do profissional de nutrição (Barr et al, 2004;Chapman et al, 2005;MacLellan & Berenbaum, 2007;Marchessault et al, 2007;Taylor et al, 2016;Dworatzek & Stier, 2016;Willer et al, 2019), em sua maioria, analisam como nutricionistas da área clínica utilizam abordagens não prescritivas no cuidado de indivíduos com obesidade. Ampliar esses estudos a fim entender como outras áreas de atuação se relacionam com tais abordagens é fundamental para dar início à discussão sobre quais similitudes, avanços e limitações estas apresentam em comparação com o modelo tradicional de cuidado em nutrição, além de contribuir para lançar luz sobre como esses profissionais percebem e conduzem a sua práxis.…”