2009
DOI: 10.1159/000230674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian Lungfish <i>(Neoceratodus forsteri)</i>: A Missing Link in the Evolution of Complementary Side Biases for Predator Avoidance and Prey Capture

Abstract: Side biases in behavior, reflecting lateral specializations of the brain, are widespread amongst vertebrates. We studied laterality in the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) to gain insight into the evolution of the complementary specializations of predator avoidance (right hemisphere) and foraging behavior (left hemisphere). Because N. forsteri is the closest extant ancestor of the first land-dwelling vertebrates, knowledge of laterality in this species should provide a missing link in the transition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also show the tendency to observe the prey with the right eye, in accord with previous observations in the same and different species (Bonati et al, 2008;Csermely et al, 2010;Lippolis, Joss, & Rogers, 2009;Vallortigara & Rogers, 2005). Moreover, since our tests were carried out in the same individuals, we confirm that visual lateralisation in lizards allows the simultaneous performance of important day-to-day behavioural tasks, such as feeding and exploratory vigilance, and also probably antipredatory vigilance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results also show the tendency to observe the prey with the right eye, in accord with previous observations in the same and different species (Bonati et al, 2008;Csermely et al, 2010;Lippolis, Joss, & Rogers, 2009;Vallortigara & Rogers, 2005). Moreover, since our tests were carried out in the same individuals, we confirm that visual lateralisation in lizards allows the simultaneous performance of important day-to-day behavioural tasks, such as feeding and exploratory vigilance, and also probably antipredatory vigilance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A significant leftward population bias in escape response elicited by generating pressure waves was also found in a nonteleost fish, the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) (Lippolis et al 2009). By contrast, in the one-sided livebearer, Jenynsia multidentata, the distribution of laterality score was bimodal with approximately the same number of individual escaping on left or right (Bisazza et al 1997c).…”
Section: Fast Escape Responsementioning
confidence: 68%
“…While this evidence is suggestive of lateralized predatory attacks by fish in ancient times, in the modern era few studies have examined lateralization of foraging behavior experimentally. Australian Lungfish were found to bend to the right side more often to eat inanimate food items (Lippolis et al 2009) and the authors suggest the greater involvement of the left hemisphere in feeding behavior is analogous to that observed in birds and anurans (Mench & Andrew 1986;Vallortigara et al 1998; see also Andrew 2002 for a discussion of the evolution of lateralized feeding responses). A similar study that compared goldbelly topminnow selected for opposite direction of lateralization at the detour test also found opposite lateralization in prey capture but only when individuals were distracted by a concurrent task -monitoring a predator (Dadda & Bisazza 2006a).…”
Section: Foraging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, behavioral laterality at the population level is observed in some fish: the majority of individuals in a population being lateralized in one direction [26]. For example, Australian lungfish mainly show C-start escape response to the left side yet turn to the right side during feeding behavior [27]. The interspecific difference of behavioral laterality remains a contentious matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%