“…Literature indicates that training and resourcing increases the implementation of standardised ecological assessments (Burns and Neville, 2016;Sansonetti and Hoffman, 2013). Whilst the PRPP differs significantly to the AMPS in its theoretical basis, focus on cognition, clinical utility (Stigen et al, 2019) and its combined approach to occupational performance, real-world congitive strategy application and individidualised intervention (Chapparo and Ranka, 2012;Sansonetti and Hoffman, 2013), the PRPP and AMPS are the most common standardised ecological assessments used by occupational therapists (Sansonetti and Hoffman, 2013) and both require training in their use (Harper et al, 2019;Sansonetti and Hoffman, 2013). Further studies should investigate the application of the AMPS in ESD and compare PRPP to AMPS, alongside other measures.…”