2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-014-2266-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authentication of raw and processed tuna from Indonesian markets using DNA barcoding, nuclear gene and character-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Firdaus and Witomo 2014). However, the fish group in the Scombridae fish family is at the top of the list of fish caught reported by the Pondok Dadap fish landing station with the highest economic value, especially for tuna fish species (Abdullah and Rehbein 2014). In the list of all species of marine fish, Perciformes are the most consumed fish and are abundant in shallow waters and pelagic fish that have high economic value (Jaafar et al 2012).…”
Section: The Edna Metabarcoding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Firdaus and Witomo 2014). However, the fish group in the Scombridae fish family is at the top of the list of fish caught reported by the Pondok Dadap fish landing station with the highest economic value, especially for tuna fish species (Abdullah and Rehbein 2014). In the list of all species of marine fish, Perciformes are the most consumed fish and are abundant in shallow waters and pelagic fish that have high economic value (Jaafar et al 2012).…”
Section: The Edna Metabarcoding Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples included high-value species such as tunas and other scombrids, as well as numerous food fish species. Tunas and other Scombridae were caught in the Indian Ocean or Western Central Pacific Ocean as described elsewhere [29]. Samples of three catfish species (Clarias batrachus, Hemibagrus capitulum and P. hypophthalmus) two tilapia species, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and the hybrid red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.…”
Section: Fish Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the application of mtDNA markers is hampered by introgression of mt genomes and the occurrence of hybrid fish species [28]. For example, it is debatable whether mtDNA can be used to differentiate species of the genus Thunnus, even when a standardized DNA barcoding marker for animals (COI gene) has been applied [10,29,30]. Identification of Thunnus species using mtDNA markers (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear RH1 is an intronless gene of bony fish and has been suggested as an identification marker to be applied in teleost fish (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995;Rehbein, 2013;Abdullah & Rehbein, 2014). The application of RH1 may lead to false positive or misleading identification results when processed alone, without another DNA marker, such as the mtDNA marker (COI, cytb or mtDNA control region).…”
Section: Nuclear Rh1 Gene Fragment Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When only a fillet or dressed fish sample is available, however, it is suggested that the RH1 marker should not be used alone. Nuclear RH1 is an intronless gene of bony fish and has been suggested as an identification marker to be applied in teleost fish (Fitzgibbon et al, 1995;Rehbein, 2013;Abdullah & Rehbein, 2014).…”
Section: Nuclear Rh1 Gene Fragment Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%