Author productivity pattern and applicability of Lotka’s inverse square law: a bibliometric appraisal of selected LIS open access journals

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to know whether the authors’ productivity pattern of library and information science (LIS) open access journals adheres to Lotka’s inverse square law of scientific productivity. Since the law was introduced, it has been tested in various fields of knowledge, and results have varied. This study has closely followed Lotka’s inverse square law in the field of LIS open access journals to find a factual result and set a baseline for future studies on author productivity of LIS open access journals. Design/methodology/approach The publication data of selected ten LIS open access journals pertain to authorship, citations were downloaded from the Scopus database and analysed using bibliometric indicators like authorship pattern, collaborative index (CI), degree of collaboration (DC), collaborative coefficient (CC) and citation counts. This study has applied Lotka’s inverse square law to assess authors’ productivity pattern of LIS open access journals and further Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) goodness-of-fit test applied for testing of observed and expected author productivity data. Findings Inferences were drawn for the set objectives on authorship pattern, collaboration trend and authors’ productivity pattern of LIS open access journals covered in this study. The single authorship pattern is dominant in LIS open access journals covered in this study. The CI, DC and CC are found to be 1.95, 0.47 and 0.29, respectively. The expected values as per Lotka’s law (n = −2) significantly vary from the observed values as per the chi-square test and K-S goodness-of-fit test. Hence, this study does not adhere to Lotka’s inverse square law of scientific productivity. Practical implications Researchers may find an idea about the authors’ productivity patterns of LIS open access journals. This study has used the K-S goodness-of-fit test and the chi-square test to validate the authors’ productivity data. The inferences found out from this study will be a baseline for future research on author productivity of LIS open access journals. Originality/value This study is significant from the viewpoint of the growing research on open access journals in the field of LIS and to identify the authorship pattern, collaboration trend and author productivity pattern of such journals.

Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010–2021)

“…(2021), Ramos-Rodriguez et al. (2021), Barik and Jena (2021), Gupta et al. (2021), Sahoo and Pandey (2020), Garg and Kumar (2019), etc., have used these indicators and parameters to understand the research impact and collaborative authorship patterns.…”

Hotspots and research trends of the ‘dark side of creativity’ in the last decade

“…It suggests that a minority of authors with a large number of scientific outputs typically have a greater impact, while the majority of authors exhibit lower productivity and impact. This distribution pattern has been observed across various disciplines, including education [ 19 ], computing [ 20 ], medicine [ 21 ], and others.…”

Twenty-Five Years of Research in the Journal of Special Education Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis

“…We applied bibliometric analysis using Bibliometrix, a state-of-the-art tool developed using the R programming language (Aria & Cuccurullo, 2020). Bibliometric analysis is a useful tool for gaining insight into the direction, state, and operation of a journal, and has been applied to the analysis of journals in various fields (Allik, 2013; Barik & Jena, 2021; Rauniyar et al, 2021; Sharma et al, 2021; Thanuskodi, 2017; Yihua et al, 2022). Notably, several bibliometric studies on special education have been published in recent years (Comarú et al, 2021; Hernández-Torrano et al, 2022; Sezgin et al, 2022).…”