2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24592-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Author Profile Enrichment for Cross-Linking Digital Libraries

Abstract: Abstract. This work aims at enriching author profiles with additional information to better support search and retrieval of publications across different digital libraries. To achieve this objective we exploit concepts for cross-linking data to identify correlations between one author and other authors, publications or other related information. We will introduce a profile enrichment approach which adds additional information (e.g. biographic information) from different sources to existing author profiles. Wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact can also be seen in the generated results. Concerning this, in our previous work, we have achieved significant results by enriching author profiles with additional information from different digital libraries (Hajra et al, 2015). In another study (Hajra et al, 2014), considering different cases, different combinations of these metadata also led to good results.…”
Section: Measuring the Similarity Of Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The impact can also be seen in the generated results. Concerning this, in our previous work, we have achieved significant results by enriching author profiles with additional information from different digital libraries (Hajra et al, 2015). In another study (Hajra et al, 2014), considering different cases, different combinations of these metadata also led to good results.…”
Section: Measuring the Similarity Of Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Concerning this, in our previous work we have achieved very significant results by enriching author profiles with additional information from different digital libraries [25]. In another study [8], considering different cases, different combinations of these metadata also led to good results.…”
Section: Publications Metadata and Vector Space Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Jaro-Winkler similarity is often used to calculate the similarity of short strings, especially for personal names (Bilenko, Mooney, Cohen, Ravikumar, & Fienberg, 2003). In our implementation, two authors are compared with each other if their names have a Jaro-Winkler similarity of at least 0.9 following Donner (2014) and Hajra, Radevski, and Tochtermann (2015). Concerning the rules for the author name disambiguation, we use factors that have already proven to be reliable in the literature and which are rated according to their importance (Caron & van Eck, 2014;Cen, Dragut, Si, & Ouzzani, 2013;Dendek, Bolikowski, & Lukasik, 2012;Protasiewicz & Dadas, 2016).…”
Section: Author Name Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine whether an author in our knowledge graph is identical to a registered author at ORCID, we compare the authors by means of a variety of features, such as the author's name, the titles of the author's publications, the co-authorship of authors, as well as the identifiers of publications (Hajra et al, 2015;Radevski, Hajra, & Limani, n.d.). A challenge here is that scientific authors usually only list their scientific publications on their public ORCID record, but not published data sets (see Table 13).…”
Section: Linking Of the Data Set Authors To Orcidmentioning
confidence: 99%