2013
DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2013.826061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authority Control in a Digital Repository: Preparing for Linked Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Niu (2013) proposed a revolutionary framework in which authorized name headings should be replaced by globally unique identifiers either in or outside of the library community. Myntti and Cothran (2013) brought Linked Data into authority control in digital repositories, which are usually coded in Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) or other standards. In this project, certain metadata fields in XML files were standardized and normalized in accordance with the Library of Congress Names Authority Files (LCNAF) and the LCSH.…”
Section: Evolvement Of Authority Control In the Library Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niu (2013) proposed a revolutionary framework in which authorized name headings should be replaced by globally unique identifiers either in or outside of the library community. Myntti and Cothran (2013) brought Linked Data into authority control in digital repositories, which are usually coded in Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) or other standards. In this project, certain metadata fields in XML files were standardized and normalized in accordance with the Library of Congress Names Authority Files (LCNAF) and the LCSH.…”
Section: Evolvement Of Authority Control In the Library Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project was motivated by not the desire to implement standards across collections, but the desire to implement linked data-friendly metadata. "The premise of linked data is that information need only be updated once since the relevant information in linked data references resides in a single location" 7 Myntti asserts the importance of using LCNAF records when possible because they are stable but acknowledges that digital collections tend to use local names that are seldom present in the LCNAF. 8 Linked data initiatives provide another motivation for digital collections managers to create authority records that are interoperable across institutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process adapted existing services provided by Backstage Library Works to utilize algorithms for reconciling uncontrolled names and subject terms in XML data and replace them with authorized constructions. 15 Frank outlined a method of batch-processing MARC records using MarcEdit and Python, an open source programming language, plus PyMARC, a Python library for parsing MARC record data. 16 To automate the importing of metadata and content during a data migration into the DSpace archive directory format, Walsh at Ohio State University Libraries used Excel, Python, and Perl, another open-source programming language.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%