Authority without Foundations: Arendt and the Paradox of Postwar German Memory Politics

Abstract

Hannah Arendt argued that the American Revolution revealed for the first time that all regimes require a reference to an absolute, while the French Revolution revealed that not all absolutes are equal. The American Revolution took as its absolute the act of founding itself, upon which the authority of the constitution could be grounded. By contrast, the failure of the French Revolution to establish an authority stemmed from its reference to the transcendental absolute of the nation. Beginnings, for Arendt, are historically determining. How then are we to explain the present view of authority in Germany which takes as its absolute referent the Holocaust? And how does this inform our understanding of the relationship between absolutes and new foundations? We argue that the key to understanding the German case is found in the particular nature of postwar German memory politics and that authority is not statically related to positive foundations.The need for an absolute manifested itself in many different ways, assumed different disguises, and found different solutions. Its function within the political sphere, however, was always the same: it was needed to break two vicious circles, the one apparently inherent to human law-making, and the other inherent in the petitio principii which attends every new beginning, that is, politically speaking, in the very task of foundation.

Activating the socialist past for a nativist future: far-right intellectuals and the prefigurative power of multidirectional nostalgia in Dresden

“…States, movements and parties rely on 'usable pasts', i.e. representations of the past that are 'usable' for the legitimization of present political action and the founding of political authority (Hoye & Nienass, 2014;Wüstenberg & Art, 2008). A nostalgic reference to a collective memory is not limited to far-right or far-left populism (De Vries & Hoffmann, 2018, p. 5).…”