2022
DOI: 10.1037/pha0000499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors, editors, and gender in the Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology: An update.

Abstract: The Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology journal was examined based on authorship and gender from 2007 to 2020. Data were calculated for total authorship by gender (women and men), authorship as first author by gender, articles with at least one woman as an author, articles with at least one man as an author, and collaborative articles. There were 3,442 listed authors across 794 articles. Women and men accounted for 43.3% and 55.5% authorship, respectively, irrespective of authorship order. Women were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the time I have been editor, the field has become increasingly cognizant of the importance of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. So, although the editorial fellowship program may help to address some of those issues, and, as shown in this recent article in Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (Curiel, 2022), we have made strides in certain areas (e.g., our group of consulting editors comprises approximately 50% women and 50% men), we have much to improve on in terms of representation of people from underrepresented backgrounds (broadly defined) at the journal and in the field. APA Publishing is enabling this by building measures that journal teams can use to understand who their authors and reviewers are and by providing a diversity toolkit for journal editors, which I am honored to have contributed to (https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ equity-diversity-inclusion-toolkit).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the time I have been editor, the field has become increasingly cognizant of the importance of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. So, although the editorial fellowship program may help to address some of those issues, and, as shown in this recent article in Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (Curiel, 2022), we have made strides in certain areas (e.g., our group of consulting editors comprises approximately 50% women and 50% men), we have much to improve on in terms of representation of people from underrepresented backgrounds (broadly defined) at the journal and in the field. APA Publishing is enabling this by building measures that journal teams can use to understand who their authors and reviewers are and by providing a diversity toolkit for journal editors, which I am honored to have contributed to (https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ equity-diversity-inclusion-toolkit).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%