2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-021-01675-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors need to be prudent when assigning names to microbial isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…61 A cut-off value of 98.7% was used as a first layer of delineation between known and novel species. 62…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…61 A cut-off value of 98.7% was used as a first layer of delineation between known and novel species. 62…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 A cut-off value of 98.7% was used as a first layer of delineation between known and novel species. 62 For phage infection assays, E. coli strains were incubated in BHI medium overnight at 37 °C and 100 µl of biomass was plated onto LB agar plates. After drying, 2.5 µl of phage lysate dilution series (in BHI medium down to 10 -7 ) were pipetted onto the plate, each dilution in triplicate.…”
Section: Bacterial Isolation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, conventional and high throughput sequencers can amplify all the nine variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Although, many 16S rRNA-based bacterial identification studies lack a complete set of variable regions (Stackebrandt et al 2021). The classical and high throughput sequencing technologies produce a large volume of whole-genome data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%