2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors’ reply to Bradley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…96 No-one involved in Parker seems to have been aware that the established legal understanding of Magna Carta and its impact upon fishing rights was just about to be challenged as a matter of its historical accuracy in a book entitled The History and Law of Fisheries written by Stuart A. Moore and H. Stuart Moore and published in 1902. 97 They showed that the chapters about bridges and riverbank enclosures were aimed at controlling the king's hunting rather than his fishing rights. 98 They also demonstrated that subjects as well as kings made grants of fishings that excluded public rights therein and that in the king's case this flowed from property rather than prerogative.…”
Section: Scots Law Magna Carta and Musselsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…96 No-one involved in Parker seems to have been aware that the established legal understanding of Magna Carta and its impact upon fishing rights was just about to be challenged as a matter of its historical accuracy in a book entitled The History and Law of Fisheries written by Stuart A. Moore and H. Stuart Moore and published in 1902. 97 They showed that the chapters about bridges and riverbank enclosures were aimed at controlling the king's hunting rather than his fishing rights. 98 They also demonstrated that subjects as well as kings made grants of fishings that excluded public rights therein and that in the king's case this flowed from property rather than prerogative.…”
Section: Scots Law Magna Carta and Musselsmentioning
confidence: 99%