2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authors’ Reply to Dr. Malerbi: “Insulin Glargine in a Brazilian State: Should the Government Disinvest?”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to increasing the routine availability of insulins alongside reducing co-payments where concerns, it is better for countries to focus initially on increasing the availability of NPH insulins as opposed to procuring more expensive insulin analogues apart from those necessary to treat insulin resistant patients. This is because a number of published studies from academic and HTA units have not demonstrated significant differences between NPH and the more expensive long acting insulins in terms of reducing hypoglycaemia episodes or on patient's quality of life (163)(164)(165)(166)(167)(168)(169)(170). However, this finding was not universal (171).…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to increasing the routine availability of insulins alongside reducing co-payments where concerns, it is better for countries to focus initially on increasing the availability of NPH insulins as opposed to procuring more expensive insulin analogues apart from those necessary to treat insulin resistant patients. This is because a number of published studies from academic and HTA units have not demonstrated significant differences between NPH and the more expensive long acting insulins in terms of reducing hypoglycaemia episodes or on patient's quality of life (163)(164)(165)(166)(167)(168)(169)(170). However, this finding was not universal (171).…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six articles reported four instances of non–evidence-based use of health technologies in Brazil, Colombia, and Uruguay, meaning that funding the health technologies under consideration might not represent the most appropriate allocation of resources in those particular settings (Table 2) (1217). However, only in one of these programs, reported in three articles, was active disinvestment suggested (12;16;17). These three articles referred to an SLR conducted to assess the effectiveness of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus; the original study showed no added benefit for insulin glargine, and the authors explicitly recommended the State Government of Minas Gerais, Brazil, delisting of insulin glargine or negotiating a price reduction (12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three articles referred to an SLR conducted to assess the effectiveness of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus; the original study showed no added benefit for insulin glargine, and the authors explicitly recommended the State Government of Minas Gerais, Brazil, delisting of insulin glargine or negotiating a price reduction (12). The additional two articles were published commentaries on the original article (16;17). The other three cases identified reported the use of ineffective or harmful medicines and medical practices in Brazil, Uruguay, and Colombia (Table 2) (13–15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%