2007
DOI: 10.1561/1500000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authorship Attribution

Abstract: Authorship attribution, the science of inferring characteristics of the author from the characteristics of documents written by that author, is a problem with a long history and a wide range of application. Recent work in "non-traditional" authorship attribution demonstrates the practicality of automatically analyzing documents based on authorial style, but the state of the art is confusing. Analyses are difficult to apply, little is known about type or rate of errors, and few "best practices" are available. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
257
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(137 reference statements)
2
257
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…But that memorable illustration rests on exceptional conditions. It presumes: a control group of other texts whose authorship is incontrovertibly established and which reveal reliance on pet function-words; comparison works in the same genre produced at the same time; a small number of candidate authors (preferably two); and, to wit, conditions of falsifiability specified in advance (Craig, 2004, p. 287;Juola, 2006). Since these parameters are largely absent whenever we attempt a critical judgment of what a composition most instructively 'is' (LM, p. 5), Lee and Martin's reliance upon the forensic question of who physically moved pen on paper is inapt for rendering word counts plausibly determinative of much else.…”
Section: Do Counts Measure Meaning?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But that memorable illustration rests on exceptional conditions. It presumes: a control group of other texts whose authorship is incontrovertibly established and which reveal reliance on pet function-words; comparison works in the same genre produced at the same time; a small number of candidate authors (preferably two); and, to wit, conditions of falsifiability specified in advance (Craig, 2004, p. 287;Juola, 2006). Since these parameters are largely absent whenever we attempt a critical judgment of what a composition most instructively 'is' (LM, p. 5), Lee and Martin's reliance upon the forensic question of who physically moved pen on paper is inapt for rendering word counts plausibly determinative of much else.…”
Section: Do Counts Measure Meaning?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discussed the state of the art of the authorship attribution problem in our previous work on application of syntactic n-grams for authorship attribution [1]; also see various related works on authorship attribution [7,8,9,10], among many others. Here we will just briefly state the problem.…”
Section: Authorship Attribution Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable prior work in authorship attribution [1,12,13]. But currently no tool is available to allow circumvention of the authorship attribution techniques to achieve anonymity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%