2017
DOI: 10.1080/13576275.2017.1291604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auto/biographical approaches to researching death and bereavement: connections, continuums, contrasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of such autoethnographies is evocative emphasising the story as the central product of the research (Ellis et al, 2011). In contrast, I frame my research as analytic autoethnography (Anderson, 2006) an approach which positions the stories of lived experience within the cultural context and emphasises constructed and situated knowledges of bereavement (Brennan & Letherby, 2017). An analytic approach to autoethnography positions experiences within the current knowledge of suicide and broader societal contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus of such autoethnographies is evocative emphasising the story as the central product of the research (Ellis et al, 2011). In contrast, I frame my research as analytic autoethnography (Anderson, 2006) an approach which positions the stories of lived experience within the cultural context and emphasises constructed and situated knowledges of bereavement (Brennan & Letherby, 2017). An analytic approach to autoethnography positions experiences within the current knowledge of suicide and broader societal contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analytic approach to autoethnography positions experiences within the current knowledge of suicide and broader societal contexts. The stories focus on specific experiences of the structural meanings of suicide (Brennan & Letherby, 2017) and, as such, seek to contribute to social constructionist understandings of the experience of being bereaved by suicide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, critics of auto/biography assert that it is self-indulgent and both academically and intellectually weak. In rebutting that accusation, Brennan and Letherby (2017) counter that auto/biographyenables us to read the contextual into the personal and it is an epistemological approach that acknowledges the significance of the personhood of all involved. A self-conscious auto/biographical approach is academically rigorous in that it highlights the social location of the writer and makes clear the author’s role in the process of constructing rather than discovering the story/the knowledge.…”
Section: Introducing the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Brennan and Letherby (2017) argue that auto/biography recognises and acknowledges the significance of the personal contexts of both the researcher and the other. They extend their argument to make a case for an ‘autobiographical continuum’ (Brennan and Letherby, 2017: 54) ranging from auto/biography to auto/biography. The former refers to academics that write about themselves and recognise the importance of others in their story.…”
Section: Introducing the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation