1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb06652.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoantibodies against oxidized low density lipoproteins (oxLDL): characterization of antibody isotype, subclass, affinity and effect on the macrophage uptake of oxLDL

Abstract: SUMMARY Circulating antibodies against oxLDL are present in several inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Such antibodies are also present in patients with atherosclerosis, although the pathogenic significance of the antibodies is still not known. We have characterized the antibodies with regard to isotype, subclass, affinity and effect on macrophage uptake of oxLDL. Antibodies of IgG and IgM isotype were most common and found both in patients with atherosclerosis and in normal individuals. The subclass of I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar predominance of IgG antibodies of subclasses 1 and 3 has been demonstrated in purified AGE-LDL antibodies [19]. Our data contradicts the isotypic distribution of oxLDL antibodies reported by Wu and Lefvert [32], particularly in what concerns the subclass distribution. It must be noted that these authors did not test purified antibodies, and the mouse monoclonal anti-IgG2 antiserum they used is known to have significant issues of specificity and accuracy [33] and to yield higher values for IgG2 than methods using radial immunodiffusion and polyclonal antibodies [11].…”
Section: Structural and Biological Characteristics Of Modified Ldl Ansupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A similar predominance of IgG antibodies of subclasses 1 and 3 has been demonstrated in purified AGE-LDL antibodies [19]. Our data contradicts the isotypic distribution of oxLDL antibodies reported by Wu and Lefvert [32], particularly in what concerns the subclass distribution. It must be noted that these authors did not test purified antibodies, and the mouse monoclonal anti-IgG2 antiserum they used is known to have significant issues of specificity and accuracy [33] and to yield higher values for IgG2 than methods using radial immunodiffusion and polyclonal antibodies [11].…”
Section: Structural and Biological Characteristics Of Modified Ldl Ansupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A protective role was proposed by several groups (Binder et al, 2003;Hörkkö et al, 1999;Palinski et al, 1995;Zhou et al, 2001;Freigang et al, 1998;George et al, 1998;Binder et al, 2003;Li and Glass, 2002). In contrast, a contributory role in atherogenesis was also proposed (Rose and Afanasyeva, 2003;Stemme et al, 1995;Wu and Lefvert, 1995). In this study, we show that P2-8 and P3-175 isolated from patients with atherosclerosis display inhibitory effects on oxLDL uptake by macrophage cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…27 Patients were considered to have aPL antibodies if they had IgM and/or IgG antiphospholipid antibodies and/or LAC, as described above, or if these antibodies were present between TD and T0, as recorded in the medical records.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%