1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2624-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports

Abstract: ), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
(494 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we cannot be sure how each ROI changed between each time point, and the connecting lines used for visualization purposes in figure 3b and figure 4 should be interpreted with caution. The ability to interpret the behavioral results of the present study is impacted by the uncertainty associated with both self-report questionnaires and retrospective assessment [43] and by the limited number of participants completing the self-report survey (i.e. 24 of 33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we cannot be sure how each ROI changed between each time point, and the connecting lines used for visualization purposes in figure 3b and figure 4 should be interpreted with caution. The ability to interpret the behavioral results of the present study is impacted by the uncertainty associated with both self-report questionnaires and retrospective assessment [43] and by the limited number of participants completing the self-report survey (i.e. 24 of 33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys of busy researchers require considerable time and effort spent by administrators to overcome low response rates and researcher mobility. The resulting data suffer from the well-documented methodological limitations of self-reported questionnaires [3][4][5]. When follow-up survey information is successfully gathered, the lack of comparable data from appropriate reference groups poses significant challenges to rigorous evaluation.…”
Section: Kl2 Mentored Career Development Awards In the Clinical And Translational Science Award Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a non-standardized tool, developed in order to retrieve memories from the childhood period as well as some other qualitative measures concerning present characteristics of the respondent's life. Since our study is by its nature an exploratory one, we have accepted all the limitations and risks related to such instruments as extensively analyzed by Schwarz and Sudman (1994). LHSurv consists of items addressing the following areas: family health history, family support, physical contact with family members and peers experienced in childhood, life success, sex life, and social relations.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%