2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7472200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autocalibration of lidar and optical cameras via edge alignment

Abstract: We present a new method for joint automatic extrinsic calibration and sensor fusion for a multimodal sensor system comprising a LI-DAR and an optical camera. Our approach exploits the natural alignment of depth and intensity edges when the calibration parameters are correct. Thus, in contrast to a number of existing approaches, we do not require the presence or identification of known alignment targets. On the other hand, the characteristics of each sensor modality, such as sampling pattern and information mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper bounds initially decay very fast, but their rate of decay decreases for large iterations (this is a typical characteristic of objective functions designed using the floor operator). As expected,Q computed using (11) decays faster than that of (5), showing that (11) indeed yields a tighter upper bound. The BnB method is able to find all of the inliers after 475 iterations when the tight upper bound is used and after 625 iterations when the original upper bound is used.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The upper bounds initially decay very fast, but their rate of decay decreases for large iterations (this is a typical characteristic of objective functions designed using the floor operator). As expected,Q computed using (11) decays faster than that of (5), showing that (11) indeed yields a tighter upper bound. The BnB method is able to find all of the inliers after 475 iterations when the tight upper bound is used and after 625 iterations when the original upper bound is used.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Here, we propose edge alignments as our matching mechanism via corresponding isotropic gradient magnitudes of the prior-map and local map of ground reflectivities. A similar matching criterion was envisioned in the work of [37] for LIDAR-to-vision registration. One of the advantages of this procedure is that a post-factory reflectivity calibration process to reduce the variations in response across the multiple lasers observing the ground is not required to compute any of the global or local maps.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here, continuing the work of [23] we propose edge alignments as our matching mechanism via corresponding isotropic gradients of the global and local grids. A similar matching criterion was envisioned in [24] for the joint registration and LIDAR-camera fusion.…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%