2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autochthony and orientation patterns in Olduvai Bed I: a re-examination of the status of post-depositional biasing of archaeological assemblages from FLK North (FLKN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assemblages affected by water disturbance may adopt a variety of forms, ranging from (peri)autochthonous rearranged assemblages and biased lag assemblages to transported assemblages. A substantial amount of research has been aimed at evaluating the degree of distortion introduced by physical processes (namely, water flows and, to a lesser extent, slope gravity) in paleontological and archaeological sites during the biostratinomic stage of their formation (see reviews in [1], [2], [3]). The diverse variables most frequently used to infer physical disturbance include the following: sedimentology, where mineral grain size selection is suggestive of depositional energy; preferential orientation of items [4], [5], [6]; the presence of physical signs of modification caused by transportation, such as rounding, polishing and abrasion [7], [8]; for bones, differential anatomical representation according to element type [6], [9]; and for lithic assemblages, a combination of quantitative variables based on average weight, a large-to-small artefact ratio and the relative representation of the fraction <50 g, where those assemblages affected by water show high values for the former two variables and low values for the latter [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assemblages affected by water disturbance may adopt a variety of forms, ranging from (peri)autochthonous rearranged assemblages and biased lag assemblages to transported assemblages. A substantial amount of research has been aimed at evaluating the degree of distortion introduced by physical processes (namely, water flows and, to a lesser extent, slope gravity) in paleontological and archaeological sites during the biostratinomic stage of their formation (see reviews in [1], [2], [3]). The diverse variables most frequently used to infer physical disturbance include the following: sedimentology, where mineral grain size selection is suggestive of depositional energy; preferential orientation of items [4], [5], [6]; the presence of physical signs of modification caused by transportation, such as rounding, polishing and abrasion [7], [8]; for bones, differential anatomical representation according to element type [6], [9]; and for lithic assemblages, a combination of quantitative variables based on average weight, a large-to-small artefact ratio and the relative representation of the fraction <50 g, where those assemblages affected by water show high values for the former two variables and low values for the latter [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the spatial distribution of archaeological and paleontological remains has been frequently addressed through the analysis of artefact and ecofact evidence orientation and the influence of agents such as water currents (Voorhies 1969;Petraglia and Potts 1994;Gutiérrez and Kaufmann 2007;Benito-Calvo and de la Torre 2011;Domínguez-Rodrigo et al 2012;Domínguez-Rodrigo and García-Pérez 2013). During both the continental phase and the marine phase of the GNLQ1 site, the influence of rivers and waves, tides and currents, respectively, might represent disruptive factors to the original dispersion of the bone assemblage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Watson's test calculates the deviations between the data and the chosen distribution. If these deviations prove to be excessive (larger than 0.186, see Zar 1984, Table B35), the statistic used for calculation will also be, by definition, excessive and the null hypothesis will be rejected (Polo García and Felicísimo 2008;Domínguez-Rodrigo et al 2012). In recent studies, both Domínguez-Rodrigo et al (2012) and Domínguez-Rodrigo and García-Pérez (2013) have discussed the different protocols utilized in order to define the orientation angle of samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several spatial methodologies have recently been proposed to gain valuable information on how natural processes affect the accumulation of remains. Fabric analysis applied to archeology is the study of the orientation of each find in an archeological deposit, by measuring its direction (bearing) and inclination (plunge); it is being used successfully to detect preferred orientations and assess natural perturbations [8], [32–36]. However, we do not have bearing and plunge measurements for all the Ambrona remains we are studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%