2018
DOI: 10.5130/ajceb.v18i3.6139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoethnography and Theory Testing

Abstract: One of the problems in construction management research is how to harvest the living experience of people working in the profession. Surveys and interviews are the common methods, but they have obvious problems, not only with defining terminology and targeting the appropriate populations but also with the knowledge of the respondents and their willingness to reflect. Autoethnography, in its conventional form, overcomes most of these problems, but creates a new set of problems, particularly in terms of our abil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflective piece (Ellis, Adams and Bochner, 2011;Chan Kent, 2020;Livesey and Runsen, 2018) aims to explore some of the patterns that emerged as we embarked on a journey of discovery trough extremely troubled waters of emergency teaching and learning. It is told in the context of an institution where more than 70% of students are first-time entrants into higher education and many students' homes are more than 500km away from campus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflective piece (Ellis, Adams and Bochner, 2011;Chan Kent, 2020;Livesey and Runsen, 2018) aims to explore some of the patterns that emerged as we embarked on a journey of discovery trough extremely troubled waters of emergency teaching and learning. It is told in the context of an institution where more than 70% of students are first-time entrants into higher education and many students' homes are more than 500km away from campus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the goal of autoethnography in this research was to uncover findings which were earlier inaccessible and therefore act as a stimulus for profound understanding (McIlveen, 2008). Livesey and Runesen (2018) argue that despite criticisms about autoethnography it 'can be applied analytically and rigorously so that it can be used for theory testing and theory building. In doing so, it opens up an untapped source of data to researchers -their own living experience.'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a result, when a tale is remembered and written, the nature of knowledge shifts in a similar way to how the author changes his or her sensitivities. In fact, autoethnography can be applied analytically and rigorously so that it can be used for theory testing and theory building (Livesey & Runeson, 2018).…”
Section: The Self As Datamentioning
confidence: 99%