1991
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199101000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autograft Versus Allograft for Benign Lesions in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Advocates of autograft attribute superior fusion and biocompatibility properties to autograft when compared with allograft; the main disadvantage with autograft being its limited supply [13]. Most studies comparing autograft and allograft fusion rates in different spinal fusion settings found no significant difference [2,4,15]. The senior author (J.O.B.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates of autograft attribute superior fusion and biocompatibility properties to autograft when compared with allograft; the main disadvantage with autograft being its limited supply [13]. Most studies comparing autograft and allograft fusion rates in different spinal fusion settings found no significant difference [2,4,15]. The senior author (J.O.B.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No data are avilable on the application of the bovine substitute Lubboc after curettage of benign tumors, although good results have been described for allografts (Glancy et al 1991). We found that allografts integrated faster than Lubboc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Calcium sulfate is osteoconductive, supports the ingrowth of blood vessels and osteogenic cells, acts as space filler, and prevents in-growth of soft tissue [3,6,7,14]. Calcium sulfate has long been used to fill bone defects and as a bone graft substitute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%