Autoimmune Channelopathies at Neuromuscular Junction

Duan

et al. 2020

Neuropathology

Self Cite

Multiple Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD), one of the most common lipid storage myopathies (LSMs), is a heterogeneous inherited muscular disorder that is pathologically characterized by numerous lipid droplets in muscle fibers due to lipid metabolism disturbance. MADD exhibits a wide range of clinical features, including skeletal muscle weakness and multisystem dysfunctions. However, MADD, as well as other types of LSM, associated with peripheral neuropathy has rarely been reported during the past four decades. Here, we present four Chinese patients affected by MADD with peripheral neuropathy in our neuromuscular center. Clinically, these four patients showed skeletal muscle weakness and prominent paresthesia. Muscle biopsy detected characteristic myopathological patterns of LSM, such as obvious lipid droplets in muscle fibers. Sural nerve biopsy revealed a severe reduction in number of myelinated nerve fibers, which is a typical neuropathological pattern of peripheral neuropathy. Causative ETFDH mutations were found in all four cases. The skeletal muscle weakness was rapidly improved after some treatments while paresthesia showed unsatisfactory improvement. The features of previously reported patients of this specific type are also summarized in this paper. We propose that MADD with peripheral neuropathy may be a new phenotypic subtype because the pathology and reaction to riboflavin treatment are different from those of traditional MADD, although further research on the precise pathogenesis and mechanisms is needed.

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Demographic and Clinical Featuresmentioning

confidence: 98%

Investigation of adult‐onset multiple acyl‐CoA dehydrogenase deficiency associated with peripheral neuropathy

Duan

et al. 2020

Neuropathology

Self Cite

“…Generally, the onset occurs in the neonatal period. The diagnosis of congenital myopathy should be based on a careful review of the clinical features and confirmed by additional investigations, with an exclusionary diagnosis of other myopathies (2,3). Previously, histopathologically oriented classification was widely used for the diagnosis of congenital myopathy, which, although still in use, tends to be replaced by genetic diagnosis in the golden era of modern genetics (4)(5)(6).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Congenital Myopathy

Yang

2021

Front. Neurol.

Self Cite

Background: Congenital myopathy constitutes a heterogeneous group of orphan diseases that are mainly classified on the basis of muscle biopsy findings. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of congenital myopathy through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for original research articles published in English prior to July 30, 2021. The quality of the included studies was assessed by a checklist adapted from STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). To derive the pooled epidemiological prevalence estimates, a meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q statistic as well as the I2 statistic.Results: A total of 11 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Of the 11 studies included, 10 (90.9%) were considered medium-quality, one (9.1%) was considered low-quality, and no study was assessed as having a high overall quality. The pooled prevalence of congenital myopathy in the all-age population was 1.50 (95% CI, 0.93–2.06) per 100,000, while the prevalence in the child population was 2.73 (95% CI, 1.34–4.12) per 100,000. In the pediatric population, the prevalence among males was 2.92 (95% CI, −1.70 to 7.55) per 100,000, while the prevalence among females was 2.47 (95% CI, −1.67 to 6.61) per 100,000. The prevalence estimates of the all-age population per 100,000 were 0.20 (95% CI 0.10–0.35) for nemaline myopathy, 0.37 (95% CI 0.21–0.53) for core myopathy, 0.08 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.18) for centronuclear myopathy, 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–0.42) for congenital fiber-type disproportion myopathy, and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24–0.44) for unspecified congenital myopathies. In addition, the prevalence estimates of the pediatric population per 100,000 were 0.22 (95% CI 0.03–0.40) for nemaline myopathy, 0.46 (95% CI 0.03–0.90) for core myopathy, 0.44 (95% CI 0.03–0.84) for centronuclear myopathy, 0.25 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.54) for congenital fiber-type disproportion myopathy, and 2.63 (95% CI 1.64–3.62) for unspecified congenital myopathies.Conclusions: Accurate estimates of the prevalence of congenital myopathy are fundamental to supporting public health decision-making. The high heterogeneity and the lack of high-quality studies highlight the need to conduct higher-quality studies on orphan diseases.

“…Unlike the related autoimmune NMJ disorders such as MG and Lambert-Eaton syndrome, CMS with CHRNE mutations is not caused by an immune response, so theoretically, immunosuppressors are not effective [ 61 , 62 ]. Most pharmacological strategies for CMS with CHRNE mutations widely depend upon whether it is beneficial to upregulate the amount of available ACh in the synaptic cleft (such as AChEIs and DAP) or to shorten the excessive duration of synaptic current by reducing the channel-open time (such as FLX and QUIN).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pharmacological Strategy for Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome with CHRNE Mutations: A Meta-Analysis of Case Reports

Luo

et al. 2021

Self Cite

Background: Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMSs) are a heterogeneous group of neuromuscular disorders. Mutations of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor epsilon subunit gene (CHRNE) are the most common causes of these disorders. CMSs are gaining increasing recognition by clinicians. However, pharmacological treatment of CMS with CHRNE mutations has only been discussed in a small number of case reports. Objective: This study aims to determine how to choose an appropriate pharmacological strategy for CMS with CHRNE mutations. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published in English prior to June 1, 2020. The extracted data included clinical information, gene mutations, pharmacological treatment, and treatment effects. Results: A total of 48 studies and 208 CMS patients with CHRNE mutations were included in our meta-analysis. Ten different pharmacological strategies were used in these patients. Our research found that β2-adrenergic receptor agonists had the best treatment effect for CMS patients with CHRNE mutations, especially in patients with primary AChR deficiency. In addition, our analysis found no evidence that age at disease onset influences the treatment results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides evidence that (1) β2-adrenergic receptor agonist therapy could be the first choice of pharmacological strategy for treating CMS with CHRNE mutations; (2) a single-drug-regime, rather than a combination therapy, should be the first choice of treatment; and (3) it is never too late to initiate pharmacological treatment.