2023
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Autoimmune HIT” antibodies in diagnostic samples are a potential artifact and not associated with more severe outcomes

Adam J. Kanack,
Janhavi Athale,
Rachel R. Leger
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important technical issue raised by Kanack and colleagues [191] is to what extent false-positive diagnoses of aHIT may be made based on the presence of residual heparin in diagnostic samples. This is relevant because unaccounted for residual heparin could result in inadvertent detection of heparin-dependent antibodies.…”
Section: Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important technical issue raised by Kanack and colleagues [191] is to what extent false-positive diagnoses of aHIT may be made based on the presence of residual heparin in diagnostic samples. This is relevant because unaccounted for residual heparin could result in inadvertent detection of heparin-dependent antibodies.…”
Section: Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, one study [58] found residual heparin (at least 0.1 IU/mL) was present in 62% of samples referred for HIT testing. Approaches to minimize the false-positive detection of aHIT antibodies include either treatment of the sample with heparinase or to require a prolonged period (perhaps at least 12 h) from discontinuation of heparin to blood sampling [191]. Despite these reservations, Kanack and colleague did comment that some samples-including those of patients with SpHIT-do exhibit "true aHIT" with heparin-independent platelet activation.…”
Section: Technical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%