Considering the different treatment strategy for transformed follicular lymphoma (TF) as opposed to follicular lymphoma (FL), diagnosing transformation early in the disease course is important. There is evidence that 18 F-FDG has utility as a biomarker of transformation. However, quantitative thresholds may require inclusion of homogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes to account for differences in tracer uptake per subtype. Moreover, because proliferation is a hallmark of transformation, 3′-deoxy-3′-18 F-fluorothymidine ( 18 F-FLT) might be superior to 18 F-FDG in this setting. To define the best tracer for detection of TF, we performed a prospective a headto-head comparison of 18 F-FDG and 18 F-FLT in patients with FL and TF. Methods: 18 F-FDG and 18 F-FLT PET scans were obtained in 17 patients with FL and 9 patients with TF. We measured the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), defined as the lymph node with the highest uptake per patient, and SUV range , defined as the difference between the SUV max of the lymph node with the highest and lowest uptake per patient. To reduce partial-volume effects, only lymph nodes larger than 3 cm 3 (A50 isocontour) were analyzed. Scans were acquired 1 h after injection of 185 MBq of 18 F-FDG or 18 F-FLT. To determine the discriminative ability of SUV max and SUV range of both tracers for TF, receiver-operatingcharacteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: The highest SUV max was significantly higher for TF than FL for both 18 F-FDG and 18 F-FLT (P , 0.001). SUV range was significantly higher for TF than FL for 18 F-FDG (P 5 0.029) but not for 18 F-FLT (P 5 0.075). The ability of 18 F-FDG to discriminate between FL and TF was superior to that of 18 F-FLT for both the highest SUV max (P 5 0.039) and the SUV range (P 5 0.012). The cutoff value for the highest SUV max of 18 F-FDG aiming at 100% sensitivity with a maximum specificity was found to be 14.5 (corresponding specificity, 82%). For 18 F-FLT, these values were 5.1 and 18%, respectively. When the same method was applied to SUV range , the cutoff values were 5.8 for 18 F-FDG (specificity, 71%) and 1.5 for 18 F-FLT (specificity, 36%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that 18 F-FDG PET is a better biomarker for TF than 18 F-FLT PET. The proposed thresholds of highest SUV max and SUV range should be prospectively validated.