2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, our most interesting finding was the unexpectedly low mortality when compared to the expected rate described for these patients. The expected yearly mortality rate in patients with NYHA functional class III or higher, ranges between 20 and 30% [11]; in our study, 15 out of 15 patients in group A finished the 6-month follow up period of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, our most interesting finding was the unexpectedly low mortality when compared to the expected rate described for these patients. The expected yearly mortality rate in patients with NYHA functional class III or higher, ranges between 20 and 30% [11]; in our study, 15 out of 15 patients in group A finished the 6-month follow up period of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, it has shown that ABM-MNCs isolated from those patients have a significantly reduced migratory and colony-forming activity in vitro and a reduced neovascularization capacity in vivo despite similar content of hematopoietic stem cells [16]. Different cellular implantation techniques have been performed including transepicardial [1,[9][10][11][12], selective intracoronary infusion [2][3][4] percutaneous transfemoral endoventricular [5,6] or coronary venous routes [8]. Each of these delivery methods has its distinct advantages and limitations and no single approach has gained favor as the optimal technique for cell transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some trials failed to demonstrate a significant increase in cardiac function after cell transplantation when compared with controls, several other randomized trials showed measurable improvements that were comparable to established therapeutic regimes (Reffelmann et al, 2009). Nonrandomized, smaller-scale trials also produced variable results, ranging from no significant changes in left ventricular ejection fraction to a significant improvement, of up to a 14% increase, during the follow-up period (Strauer et al, 2002;Perin et al, 2004;Fernandez-Aviles et al, 2004;Ince et al, 2004;Strauer et al, 2005;Katritsis et al, 2005;Bartunek et al, 2005;Mocini et al, 2006;Gavira et al, 2006;Ahmadi et al, 2007;Choi et al, 2007;Klein et al, 2007;Li et al, 2007;Stamm et al, 2007;Tatsumi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intramyocardial bone marrow derived MNC transplantation with off-pump CABG led to significant improvement of 6 months LVEF and functional status compared to patients treated with surgery only. In the randomized trial of Mocini injections of bone marrow MNC into the peri-infarcted and infracted region (only patients with recent infarction were included) after the CABG during the cardiac arrest was compared to CABG alone (Mocini et al, 2006). The patient cohorts had moderate LV systolic dysfunction (inclusion criteria was baseline EF>35%).…”
Section: Transplantation Of Progenitor Cells and Recovery Of LV Functmentioning
confidence: 99%