2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous Breast Reconstruction: The Vanderbilt Experience (1998 to 2005) of Independent Predictors of Displeasing Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Among breast reconstruction patients, obesity has been shown to increase complication rates in both implant-based and autologous immediate breast reconstruction. 1,2,4,[6][7][8]14,[40][41][42][43][44] The overall complication rate in our obese patients undergoing oncoplastic breast reconstruction and immediate breast reconstruction was comparable to other studies 41,45 ; however, no single-center studies exist with sufficiently powered logistic regression analysis to evaluate specific predictive factors between oncoplastic breast reconstruction and immediate breast reconstruction complications among the obese. In a 2010 study, Losken et al showed that rates of complications and revision operations were significantly higher for patients following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction than for women with macromastia who underwent oncoplastic breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Among breast reconstruction patients, obesity has been shown to increase complication rates in both implant-based and autologous immediate breast reconstruction. 1,2,4,[6][7][8]14,[40][41][42][43][44] The overall complication rate in our obese patients undergoing oncoplastic breast reconstruction and immediate breast reconstruction was comparable to other studies 41,45 ; however, no single-center studies exist with sufficiently powered logistic regression analysis to evaluate specific predictive factors between oncoplastic breast reconstruction and immediate breast reconstruction complications among the obese. In a 2010 study, Losken et al showed that rates of complications and revision operations were significantly higher for patients following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction than for women with macromastia who underwent oncoplastic breast reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…18 In contrast, Greco et al conducted a retrospective review of 200 TRAM and latissimus dorsi flaps in 180 patients and found that obese patients were more likely to experience clinically significant flap infections (24.0 vs. 0%, p < 0.01). 19 We note that both Chang et al and Greco et al conducted their reviews on patients at a single institution-MD Anderson and Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN), respectively. In contrast, the ACS-NSQIP is a national, heterogeneous database, which possibly erases any regionally based effects obesity may have on wound infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mastectomy has a complication rate ranging from 14%–64% which can be significantly lowered with lumpectomy. 17,18 In this cohort, patients that were identified for treatment at stage II were the most likely to become eligible for BCT. A recent study has shown improved clinical outcomes for patients with triple negative breast cancer who undergo lumpectomy instead of mastectomy 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%