2018
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010747.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients

Abstract: Mostly low- and very low-quality evidence suggests no clear differences between different stem cell sources and different treatment regimens of autologous cell implantation for outcomes such as all-cause mortality, amputation rate, ulcer healing, and rest pain for 'no-option' CLI patients. Pooled analyses did not show a clear difference in clinical outcomes whether cells were administered via IM or IA routes. High-quality evidence is lacking; therefore the efficacy and long-term safety of autologous cells deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a large number of clinical trials have shown a positive effect of new treatment modality using regenerative potential of the autologous stem cells transplantation [ 4 ]. In 2017, a meta-analysis by Guo et al reported the effect of autologous stem cell administration in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a large number of clinical trials have shown a positive effect of new treatment modality using regenerative potential of the autologous stem cells transplantation [ 4 ]. In 2017, a meta-analysis by Guo et al reported the effect of autologous stem cell administration in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADSC are considered the most promising cell source for cell therapy because of their regenerative capacity due to secretion of pro-survival soluble factors, production of extracellular matrix proteins, and their immunomodulating properties [20,21]. However, results of numerous cell therapy clinical trials, including those with ADSC, did not meet initial expectations [22,23]. In those studies, conventionally used direct injections of cell suspensions showed limited efficacy, putatively due to low cell viability as a result of cell-to-cell interaction loss, compression damage during administration by injection, and the unfavorable microenvironment in ischemic and inflammatory tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical data about these cells have demonstrated they are safe and well-tolerated in patients. In terms of cell efficacy, current trials are very dissimilar, and this makes comparison of their results difficult, because these autologous cells have been derived from various sources, prepared using distinctive protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via diverse routes [ 20 ]. In particular, the efficiency of cell therapy on clinical end points is not as great as it was in preclinical trials in the randomized controlled trials [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Pad and Brief Overview Of Current Clinicamentioning
confidence: 99%